NL25SH: Line check, spew or rule?
09-13-2009
, 06:32 AM
Hero is about 22.4, 18,5, 3,28, 26.83 on that table. I've been outdrawn a bunch of times to I think people might put me on semi-tilt.
Villain is 58.46, 6,05, 2,41, 27,80 over 479 hands. He has been playing very agressive postflop, which also can be seen by his aggression factor by 2,41 whilst' playing 58.46 pre. I bet for value on the flop thinking I can get a call from a spade draw, which I got Q so that is often profitable against bad players who play to many hands pre. I also got the straight draw so there are not many cards that could drop on the turn that hurts me. Also, those monotone flops can easilly be dead money, if so cbetting is ofc std. Also, we are quite deep, so against this player I'd like to play big pots, (with the goods ofc)
I check turn because there are very few rivers that could hurt me, if I do hit, I think I've disguised the hand fairly well and if miss, I can get away cheaply.
When river hits and he bet I put him on slow played two-pair, set, missed draw or if I was really lucky, some sort of wierd J8, perhaps even a decent king or even a slowplayed AK with a spade that hit the river. I don't know if this is spew or not, or don't I give the fish enough respect?
This hand was played on 'Svenska Spel 0,5/1 -SH, it's run by the swedish state, alot of fish and low rakes. the currency in this hand is Swedish Crowns, 1$ is about 7 swedish crowns.
Any input would be great!
Seat 1: Hero ( 222.04 )
Seat 2: road ( 210.12 )
Seat 3: Villain ( 249.12 )
Seat 4: Peter1 ( 88.39 )
Seat 5: Jaacken ( 198.57 )
Dealt to Hero [ J
Q
]
Peter1 calls [1].
Jaacken calls [1].
Hero raises [6].
road calls [5.5].
Villain alls [5].
Peter1 folds.
Jaacken calls [5].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 9, T, 3 ]
road checks.
Villain checks
Jaacken checks.
Hero bets [18.75].
road folds.
Villain calls [18.75].
Jaacken folds.
** Dealing Turn ** [ 7
]
Villain checks.
Hero checks.
** Dealing River ** [ K
]
Villain bets [$62.5].
Hero is all-In.
Villain is 58.46, 6,05, 2,41, 27,80 over 479 hands. He has been playing very agressive postflop, which also can be seen by his aggression factor by 2,41 whilst' playing 58.46 pre. I bet for value on the flop thinking I can get a call from a spade draw, which I got Q so that is often profitable against bad players who play to many hands pre. I also got the straight draw so there are not many cards that could drop on the turn that hurts me. Also, those monotone flops can easilly be dead money, if so cbetting is ofc std. Also, we are quite deep, so against this player I'd like to play big pots, (with the goods ofc)
I check turn because there are very few rivers that could hurt me, if I do hit, I think I've disguised the hand fairly well and if miss, I can get away cheaply.
When river hits and he bet I put him on slow played two-pair, set, missed draw or if I was really lucky, some sort of wierd J8, perhaps even a decent king or even a slowplayed AK with a spade that hit the river. I don't know if this is spew or not, or don't I give the fish enough respect?
This hand was played on 'Svenska Spel 0,5/1 -SH, it's run by the swedish state, alot of fish and low rakes. the currency in this hand is Swedish Crowns, 1$ is about 7 swedish crowns.
Any input would be great!
Seat 1: Hero ( 222.04 )
Seat 2: road ( 210.12 )
Seat 3: Villain ( 249.12 )
Seat 4: Peter1 ( 88.39 )
Seat 5: Jaacken ( 198.57 )
Dealt to Hero [ J
Q ]Peter1 calls [1].
Jaacken calls [1].
Hero raises [6].
road calls [5.5].
Villain alls [5].
Peter1 folds.
Jaacken calls [5].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 9
, T, 3 ]road checks.
Villain checks
Jaacken checks.
Hero bets [18.75].
road folds.
Villain calls [18.75].
Jaacken folds.
** Dealing Turn ** [ 7
]Villain checks.
Hero checks.
** Dealing River ** [ K
]Villain bets [$62.5].
Hero is all-In.
Last edited by rippinkittin; 09-13-2009 at 06:58 AM.
