Just getting back into poker. How's my play with this flopped 2-p ?

Was betting on the flop and turn a bit low? Was pushing okay?

Thanks in advance.

edit: This is Zoom, and I dove into NL25 only 20 hands prior - so no reads at all.

fold preflop

+1.

As played, folding turn. It was 4way to the flop, and although there's not a lot of combos, that beat you, I think 33 and 66 are massive parts of his range here. Yeah, villain's sizing looks kinda fishy, but I'm thinking, he's just overly excited about his set most of the times.
...at least that's my reasoning on a regular NL25 table, but I'd probably apply it to Zoom.

Sizing-wise, yeah that's on the low side. But on the other hand, you're blocking hands that can call you quite heavily, so I guess it's not terrible to bet half pot. I'd still rather go for standard 2/3 pot.

Can't really disagree with what's already been said, fish may try this line w/ AK at my level, but in a limped pot at NL25 against an unknown I wouldn't really be expecting it. With the turn raise we don't beat enough of his perceived range to continue

Fold/3bet PF, depends on the villian, but as played, calling, we're only beat by 33.
Do you really think he calls flop with 66 on this board ? If he's fish, yeah he sometimes might call with 66, but then we need to add more hand to his range, like K6 as showed, Q6, stupid played AK, Qx with hearts. QQ/KK is almost impossible, so only 33, but you can't fold.

Would it make more sense to just call on the river instead of raising and polarising villains range?

This was similar to my reasoning. If I'm worried about a set, then KK / QQ are unlikely as I see two of each already. It would be hard for him to call the Flop C-bet with 66 with this board... though I think my low bet size makes it more possible.

So that leaves 33. Then I have to figure if it's 33 or all the other hands in the range.

And that figures into my turn All-In. After his turn 3B, I'm practically all-in if I call anyways, and I don't think I can fold given my analysis above.

My main concern was the bet sizing for my flop and turn bets - that's what really haunted me afterwards.

And yes, the unexpected suggestion to fold pre... well, I'm up against an UTG raiser, so smooth calling was probably not the best option. I like Clay's suggestion of either fold or 3bet depending... but I had no reads, so the default should have been fold.

Thanks folks.

Looks completely fine against an unknown at these limits to me.

[ ] limped pot

My bad I meant SB's calling range here

Just because he's an idiot who can have 33 doesn't make him an idiot who will play Q6 or K6 so fast. DUCY?

3bet or fold preflop.

yeah, that's what i thought myself too, by 3betting we are playing against his more merged range and our hand plays better when 3betting rather than just calling

What do you mean by this?

I mean we are playing against top x% of his range and our hand plays better here and is less dominated

Presumably you mean his calling range? So how is that playing against his merged range?? Fwiw, I think a calling range here may dominate us alot of the time.

When we 3b preflop here, it's as a bluff with blockers. By 3betting it, we will only get them to (usually) continue hands which beat us, it's as simple as that.

It's not a callable hand v EP ever, so it's a good one to 3b bluff if you think they fold wide enough.