Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NL10 zoom vs no name NL10 zoom vs no name

10-27-2013 , 12:51 PM
You're putting in a huge amount of money based on a huge amount of (unjustified) assumptions.

Also don't do this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caige
I'm holding GS or TPGK, and it's cheaper to call flop, and "hope" for some card that improves my equity, and when blank turn comes, I say to myself, oh well, only chance I can win this pot now is by c/r or some miracle river, which I'm not getting for free, since he's betting. That's where fold equity comes on the turn in this case.
NL10 zoom vs no name Quote
10-27-2013 , 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshimiii
If u think anyone is raising GS's here then you are losing so so much money when you play poker. Standard line taken by people when they have a monster at these stakes.
yea but he reps very little and we have outs vs all his nut hands, we also get to see what he has and exploit the **** out of him in other spots
NL10 zoom vs no name Quote
10-27-2013 , 01:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PantherXYZ
yea but he reps very little and we have outs vs all his nut hands, we also get to see what he has and exploit the **** out of him in other spots
Chances are you won't see him again/enough to make use of it.

Also he reps enough with such a strong line for me to want to give it to him.
NL10 zoom vs no name Quote
10-27-2013 , 01:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshimiii
Chances are you won't see him again/enough to make use of it.
I have to disagree with this Yoshimiii, since any info on a player is advantage for you in future encounters. I'm making every single note that I think it's worthy, and it has helped me so many times. Maybe it's not that much of a help on micro's where player pool is enormous, but since we can use any help and info we can get, why not write it down.
NL10 zoom vs no name Quote
10-27-2013 , 01:33 PM
Yoshimiii stop being weaktight
NL10 zoom vs no name Quote
10-27-2013 , 04:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshimiii
Chances are you won't see him again/enough to make use of it.

Also he reps enough with such a strong line for me to want to give it to him.
not only is it advantageous in future spots, which will come up a lot because people do play the same stakes regularly, but it is advantageous in learning more about the player pool

he can also be value raising worse thinking you call Qx/draws/KK-AA etc, i forgot to mention that

folding is bad
NL10 zoom vs no name Quote
10-27-2013 , 05:11 PM
Folding is fine IMO.
A c/r OTT at NL 10: I really don't like it.. We're gonna be behind most of the time
NL10 zoom vs no name Quote
10-27-2013 , 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExpectedV
Yoshimiii stop being weaktight
You can call it whatever you want but but imo people usually only ever raise monsters when they take this line on this type of board OOP.

I think you're definition of 'weak tight' here would save the most money. You're hoping to beat 89 and not much else, which might not call pre-flop and is a small part of his value range.

I'll say it again, GOOD FOLD OP!
NL10 zoom vs no name Quote
10-27-2013 , 06:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshimiii
You can call it whatever you want but but imo people usually only ever raise monsters when they take this line on this type of board OOP.

I think you're definition of 'weak tight' here would save the most money. You're hoping to beat 89 and not much else, which might not call pre-flop and is a small part of his value range.

I'll say it again, GOOD FOLD OP!
Caps lock takes it down.
NL10 zoom vs no name Quote

      
m