Ok so theres two hands but im more interested in the scenario and what is most profitable long term.
Scenario 1. In almost every session i have im dealt KK vs AA or vice versa (easier to remember when i have KK but i know im with AA almost same amount of times). This hand is where my opponent must have AA and im supposed to loose it all and blame it on a cooler.
Question: do we really have to call? I know that if i would fold people would laugh and tell me im stupid for folding KK and also what is the damn probability to be dealt these cooler hands at the rate its happening? I usually play 2k hands a session and it's seriously happening almost each session.
btw i have 100 hands on this guy and he seems to be a typical tag player.
Preflop: Hero is CO with K K
MP raises to $0.85, Hero raises to $2.90, 2 folds, BB raises to $55.31 and is all-in, MP folds, Hero calls $22.44 and is all-in
Flop: ($51.63) T 6 6 (2 players, 2 are all-in) Turn: ($51.63) 7 (2 players, 2 are all-in) River: ($51.63) 2 (2 players, 2 are all-in)
Spoiler:
Results: $51.63 pot ($2.00 rake)
Final Board: T 6 6 7 2
BB showed A A and won $49.63 ($24.29 net)
Hero showed K K and lost (-$25.34 net)
Second hand got lost somewhere so i cant post it but basicly i had AQs utg and got 2 callers (MP and BB), flop comes 288 and i now have a FD+2 good overs. I bet 70% of the pot and MP raises quite big.
Question: since i have no reads on my opponent is is it most profitable to let it go assuming he has 22 or just some sort of 8 in his hand or do we shove assuming he has overpair, where as im ahead, right?
We both had 100 bb btw
Snap, people do this **** with AK and worse PPs too. I only remember someone with reggy stats spazz jamming AA like this once.
second hand you don't need to cbet 70%. I think he pretty much has to be bluffing some % to stack off profitably because trips get decent equity vs flushdraws because their full house outs eat up yours. Stove it and see.