Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
KT KT

01-07-2017 , 02:11 PM
Winning Poker Network (Yatahay) - $0.02 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

SB: 152.5 BB (VPIP: 29.51, PFR: 19.67, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 62)
BB: 182 BB (VPIP: 24.72, PFR: 18.71, 3Bet Preflop: 12.50, Hands: 1,578)
UTG: 163 BB (VPIP: 30.43, PFR: 17.39, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 23)
MP: 100 BB (VPIP: 26.32, PFR: 7.89, 3Bet Preflop: 6.67, Hands: 40)
CO: 100 BB (VPIP: 34.44, PFR: 25.56, 3Bet Preflop: 7.41, Hands: 95)
Hero (BTN): 100 BB

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has K T

fold, MP raises to 3 BB, CO calls 3 BB, Hero calls 3 BB, fold, fold

Flop: (10.5 BB, 3 players) K 4 5
MP bets 5 BB, CO calls 5 BB, Hero calls 5 BB

Turn: (25.5 BB, 3 players) 2
MP bets 16 BB, CO calls 16 BB, Hero calls 16 BB

River: (73.5 BB, 3 players) K
MP bets 76 BB and is all-in, fold
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 03:33 PM
Villain has a bit of a nitty raising range.
I would have folded on the turn.
Actually, I think I would have just folded this hand preflop against this particular villain. Your hand is too easily dominated.
I'd rather call with small and medium pocket pairs, and low to middle suited connectors Vs KTs against a guy with such a low PFR.
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 04:21 PM
folding turn.
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 10:00 PM
Agree with fold turn
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 10:11 PM
multiway I just fold pre.
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 10:24 PM
Anybody considering a 3 bet pre here?
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 10:39 PM
Folding pre is probably your best option. You're just too easily dominated. Would you have called if it weren't suited? Be honest.

And, yeah, this is why. We have to fold on the turn as there's no way he's raising pre with K9 or K8. So our KT is realistically no better than QQ in this spot.
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 10:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtyroofer
Anybody considering a 3 bet pre here?
Hrm, not really. Frankly I'd prefer to 3-bet something like 56 as villain only continues vs our KT with dominating hands. If we want him to fold AT/KQ and so on to the 3-bet then what do we need a hand like KT for?
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 10:45 PM
^ I just thought if V's PFR is 8% he might have a low fold to 3bet % as well. In which case we might take pot pre on a 3 bet.
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 10:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleCrumble
Hrm, not really. Frankly I'd prefer to 3-bet something like 56 as villain only continues vs our KT with dominating hands. If we want him to fold AT/KQ and so on to the 3-bet then what do we need a hand like KT for?
I agree
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 10:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtyroofer
^ I just thought if V's PFR is 8% he might have a low fold to 3bet % as well. In which case we might take pot pre on a 3 bet.
Yeah no I like the idea, I'd just rather do it with a different hand where we aren't dominated. We aren't going to be getting postflop value from his calling range with our KT, so we're really 3-betting to bluff the flop when he checks to us.

Don't get me wrong, that may well work, but if that's our plan, then what do we need KT for? Mays well have 72o.
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 11:05 PM
^
I see your point
KT Quote
01-07-2017 , 11:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtyroofer
^ I just thought if V's PFR is 8% he might have a low fold to 3bet % as well. In which case we might take pot pre on a 3 bet.
Oh and btw - having a low PFR doesn't necessarily mean that they villain will therefore have a high fold to 3-bet at all.

It could mean, as I assume you're suggesting, that they're a generally weak-tight player who's easily bumped off hands, but it's actually more likely to mean that as their PFR range is tighter and stronger, they're more likely to continue with them vs 3-bets.

As this villain only raises 28% of the 26% of hands he chooses to play, then the hands most vulnerable to getting 3-bet from us in the BTN (hands like, say, 77 or perhaps 9T) aren't in his range - as he almost certainly limps with them.
KT Quote

      
m