Guy is 15/12/1.7 300 hands

fold 3bet 40% (5)

first hand 2 handed



x/f???

Im curious as to whats better, a x/f or a b/f. Im not good in these spots at all. Also theres a missed flush draw. If villian is capable of bluffing do we x/c?

yup x/f looks good he is just so tight we can maybe assume he won't pay us off light on the river very often and also won't bluff that much

Were you playing heads up/short handed the whole time in that 300 hand sample? Or do you not know this?

Hello KTS82

Yea, I guess we have to x/f at this point. I don't think it is really that exploitable here because I doubt Villain as that many hands in his range that he would bluff us with, especially based on those nitty stats. Maybe KQ or QJ of spades, but that's about it. He is not turning 1010 or 109s into a bluff (if he even calls w/ 910s), and unlikely try and bluff us with 77. Pretty much anything else he is likely to have has us beat, including any Ace-high FDs that made Toppair, slow-played sets, KK, QQ.

BTW, I think I would 3-bet just a little more. Taking it down PF we are OOP w/ JJ isn't necessarily a bad thing, and when he does call we are able to put him on a more specific range that we are still likely to be ahead of.

I'm curious to hear what type of hands SB check calls on the flop & the turn? Isn't a weak play if you have a FD?

After that can you fold on the river? Is he check calling with an Ace?

Don't like b/f here. The only worse hand I see him calling with is 1010 (6 combos) and we lose more money when he calls us with QQ or KK (12 combos), which he otherwise would be likely to check back.

Close. I don't think villain has many Ax in his range but if this is HU i'll just stop talking now.