Quote:
Originally Posted by DuFisch
I'm more inclined to put AT/AJ in my c/c range on AQ8r. The question is, whether it's "too much" to also c/c AK either on the flop OR the turn.
For starters, try answering the following questions when you want to decide whether to bet or x/c (These are just rough guidelines but are good for starters):
if you bet:
- which better hands will call (and how many streets ?)
- which worse hands will fold ?
if you check:
- which hands will he bet with (and how many streets ?)
- which hands will he check back ?
To answer these questions you need to consider villain`s range of course.
You also need to consider how the hand might play out on the Turn/River on different board runouts.
To make a concrete example, let`s say you open from UTG and villain calls on the Button with his super wide 25%-range. The flop is A

Q

8
If you bet villain will
- call every Ace
- call or raise every gutshot (according to your description)
- probably call any Queen as well
- fold the rest
---> You can already see how much value there is in betting your entire Value range. Try putting in the numbers in your equity calculator and see which hands have a Ton of equity and are clear cut value bets. You definitely need to bet those. You can check-call the hands, that are closer. Also you need to c-bet your own gutshots, etc. to balance your value bets and have coverage on different turns/rivers.
As for your question regarding AK on that board. Sure, if you bet Turn and River (with the intention of folding to a raise) you will lose some of the time to hands, that have you beat. But this doesn`t qualify as an argument for check-calling because if you x/c turn and river instead, you will lose the same or higher amount (depending on how much villain bets when you check and how much you would`ve bet yourself).
So when you are beat, betting with the intention of folding (= bet/folding) does not have any disadvantages compared to checking.
If you check however, you will lose value from villain`s AJ, AT, A2s, A5s,..... etc. Instead of putting villain in a crappy spot where has to decide whether he wants to call a third barrel with his Ace, crappy kicker you are now playing directly into his hands by letting him pot-control his medium strength hands, and betting his very strong hands and his bluffs. But as a bluffcatcher, AK is no different to A2 on that board. So why not x/c the A2 and bet the AK instead ? (that`s how you earn your $ against his wide range, by making him pay when he is dominated).
If you check he probably will
- bet multiple streets with all his value hands, as well as some bluffs. (This is where you need to figure out which runouts he bluffs too much or too little. This is much trickier than betting a good balanced range on your own. In poker, basically when you turn your hand into a bluffcatcher (and by checking you do exactly that) things get more iffy. Fortunately, many villains are super unbalanced in different spots, i.e. they either bluff way too much or way too little/not at all. You need to figure out how this specific villain reacts to your checks in different spots.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuFisch
V. lost 600bb today, but so did I the last 2 sessions bc I valueshoved 65s on J6356 river vs a 3barrel (50% PFR guy had JJ)
Yeah, i mean that is just part of the game. Sucks for sure, but can`t really do anything about it. A good way to deal with this sort of beats is to think about villain doing you a favour by playing such a wide and unprofitable range and that him stacking you once in a while is just the price you pay for playing in a highly +EV situation.
So this post got really long already, but there is much more to think about.
To sum it up, basically try to plan your hand ahead. Don`t think just about the current street, but also about all future streets and how villain will react to your own actions with different parts of his range.
I hope this helps