Hi guys. Thanks for repsonses.
My bad on the whole 'position' issue. A 16 post count doesn't always mean the OP is a noob. Guess I was just slightly offended. But considering the misread on my part I guess its reasonable to assume...
Thanks for confirming a shove. Don't know what I was thinking at the time. I did consider folding pf due to the big raise size... Reasoning at the time was trying to hit the flush or dry flop with an A and rags or a Qxx board. Honestly I thought MP might bet big, with CO folding and a check-raise was in order...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditch-digger73
Why call such a big pf raise from oop with AJs? I think a pf fold is ok in this spot but if you call why check the flop after you hit it with TP and its draw heavy? You check call the flop despite believing your hand is strong and then fold the turn to a pot size bet from an "aggressive" pf raiser after a blank hits? You fold because you put MP on exactly AQ. Why do you think he has AQ and if you thought he had AQ why call pf and on the flop? MP could have a variety of hands to include two pair but also sets and KK, JJ or even AK, but as you played this hand so passively and with no consideration for post flop play there was little chance you wouldnt be giving him your money?
You've got the positions slightly confused. MP was the maniac player that ended up check folding. The villian was an unknown who eventually turned out to be a rocksolid reg.
My reasoning was somewhat influenced by 'big turn raises generally mean the NUTS' ie two pair a set etc from the CO. However, my passive line messes slighly with this logic as I'm not sure if he is just playing back at me.
How would you play this after knowing CO is a nitty reg? Please comment preflop and then assume as played and comment post flop against this nit.