Should definitely 3bet A9s. It doesn't play that well post-flop. Also the relative strength of A9s vs A2s-A5s isn't that much stronger as you can make wheel straights with these hands but not with A9s.
AP fold river. Even with trips you beat no value hands at all and I don't see players at 5NL bluffing this river.
I can think of a few reasons to do this. Care to elaborate as to why you do it?
The main reason is that (readless) I think it's the most profitable strat.
3-betting nearly all suited aces works in the context of my overall strategy, which doesn't involve much flatting pre-flop in position. (But I want to have some AQs/AJs in my flatting range for board coverage, yadda yadda). Ax suited hands are just brilliant as 3-bets because of the blocker to villain's 4-bet range, and because they flop decent equity/playability vs his flatting range.
The main reason is that (readless) I think it's the most profitable strat.
3-betting nearly all suited aces works in the context of my overall strategy, which doesn't involve much flatting pre-flop in position. (But I want to have some AQs/AJs in my flatting range for board coverage, yadda yadda). Ax suited hands are just brilliant as 3-bets because of the blocker to villain's 4-bet range, and because they flop decent equity/playability vs his flatting range.
Would you do this 150BB deep? 200BB deep? I'm not folding A9s OTB the a CO open range, and I don't think you always want to play an inflated pot.
I don't know, as I haven't studied deep stack play, nor do I actually play deep very often, but I think suited aces actually play even better as 3-bets when deep, since they give you the (rare) chance to cooler lower flushes in huge pots. It's hard to get 250bb in the middle in a single-raised pot.