Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG

10-13-2009 , 12:17 PM
Villain is very passive with strong hands. Bets in weird places with no logical reason. I know I have to jam that river, but is my line/bet sizing fine given reads on villain?
Poker Stars $22+$1 No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t10/t20 Blinds - 2 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

Hero (BTN/SB): t1810 M = 60.33
BB: t1190 M = 39.67

Pre Flop: (t30) Hero is BTN/SB with 6 K
Hero raises to t60, BB calls t40

Flop: (t120) K J 4 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets t80, BB calls t80

Turn: (t280) K (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets t180, BB calls t180

River: (t640) 6 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets t280, BB raises to t560, Hero raises to t1490 all in, BB calls t310 all in
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Quote
10-13-2009 , 12:19 PM
So he has KJ? I mean, he must have or else you wouldn't be posting it.

What else are you going to do? Just call river? I mean, I guess you could do that and save 310 the number of times he has KJ but you lose out the number of times he has K4/44 here. Plus it's only 310 more..
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Quote
10-13-2009 , 12:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temp
So he has KJ?
No actually. I'm not posting this because I lost, I'm posting because I want to check my bet sizing/line vs. a villain where c/c = The nuts
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Quote
10-13-2009 , 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temp
So he has KJ? I mean, he must have or else you wouldn't be posting it.

What else are you going to do? Just call river? I mean, I guess you could do that and save 310 the number of times he has KJ but you lose out the number of times he has K4/44 here. Plus it's only 310 more..
even given the reads that c/c=the nuts, your line is fine imo. the number of time this villian has kj is small and we want to get value from lesser "nut" hands such as k4 & 44,66,jj. i think your line is fine vs villan
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Quote
10-13-2009 , 12:25 PM
oh.. I think you could bet a bit more on the river. I mean, he's never folding a jack here especially if you've been aggressive and shown down bluffs. 360 seems like a good number (he has 870 left in stack, so he'll call 360 and probably fold to 420+).
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Quote
10-13-2009 , 12:29 PM
i'd bet a bit more on the river the first time, but otherwise it looks fine.
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Quote
10-13-2009 , 12:33 PM
Ok, thanks. Fwiw villain had K5o. I was unsure of river bet size more than anything.
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Quote
10-13-2009 , 01:51 PM
I play it exactly like you did, maybe a little bigger on the river.
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Quote
10-13-2009 , 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kylebranham
Ok, thanks. Fwiw villain had K5o.
What a funny tilt-inducing (for villain) hand this would be if river was 3
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Quote
10-13-2009 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamdun
What a funny tilt-inducing (for villain) hand this would be if river was 3
lol yap you are right but i think a 2 or 3 would really be a disaster for every players mindset.

Actually i like your total line and the river bet is optimal to get value from weaker hands because you are offering good pot odds and it will be hard for him to fold a K,J ...
Bad villain, I river FH  HUSNG Quote

      
m