Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
AA line check vs. aggrofish, 3bet pot AA line check vs. aggrofish, 3bet pot

03-04-2014 , 05:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prise
gamma001: Against most people I do really want to barrel this because there is such a huge chance they have AQ/KQ or other pocket pairs, with and without FDs. With a 64%VPIP player if they are sticking around that tightly Qx and pocket pairs (the only things we crush) are not a huge chunk of their range and they're going to show up with a lot more 8x/flushes in that spot than a reg would, and would likely fold the river with most Qx anyway after that, especially on many scare cards (A/K/) - so there is no point barreling turn if we can extract the same barrel of value on the river, yet we lose less when they hit hard.
the logic there is flawed. You want to bet against someone who has a strong tight range and check against someone who has an extremely wide range and will call down light. It should be the complete opposite, but both are easy bets for value.

A fish has got more flushes than a reg here, but he also has far far more Qx, flush draws and under pairs. He has to be bluffing very little for a call to be correct because his range is so wide.

Last edited by gamma001; 03-04-2014 at 05:13 PM.
AA line check vs. aggrofish, 3bet pot Quote

      
m