Okay. How about we just chill and get back to these hands. You both make good points, so let's talk about those some more and not bash each other.
I have to agree with blades on 4bet jamming the AK in this example (unless convinced otherwise, of course). The pot is only 1.35 and we're risking 9.70 to win it uncontested. And if that QQ+ AK+ range sovo suggested for the villain calling range is correct, we're bleeding chips. If I'm thinking right, his calling range should at least include AQ and AJ to make it worth while.
I also don't like the 4bet OOP here. Even if it's a bluff (which is an idea I actually like IP, as in the AQ example). If we 4bet bluff here and raise it to say 2.20, the pot is then 3.55 and the villain has to call 1.30. We're both left with 7.80, so he could very well make the call with any pair and try to hit that set against my "monster". And with the pot now 5.55 I'm left with the disgusting c-bet of around 2.80, leaving me half the stack I started with and still no idea what I'm up against.
In the AQ example, however, we are IP and bet 0.30. We get raised 0.90 by the BB. The pot is 1.25. We could now 4bet 2.20 against his "thinner" 3bet range making the pot 3.45. He has to call 1.30 more or jam. If he jams, it's an easy fold. If he calls, it'll be more difficult for him to get it all in if he flops a set and we might not even make c-bet making the post flop very difficult for him. So in this scenario I think it might actually be worth while to make this play with that A5s. What do you say?
And if you feel up to it, Bladesman87, I'd really like to hear what you have to say about those three original hand examples. I just hate it when people say that something is wrong, but don't say how it would be better