Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatsNotPoker
I'm interested to know why you think he can't 4bet pre. He has a strong starting hand which needs protecting. Why shouldn't he make him pay to see the flop? Also the flop isn't particularly scary, why just call? Not suggesting you're wrong but just interested why you opt for just calling.
More terminology really, hero can only 3bet pre flop as i think he was only facing a raise wasnt he. Same with the flop hero can only raise(2bet i guess) so the villain would be the one with the option to 3bet.
Pre flop is going to be very villain dependent, 3betting a guy opening 15% from EP with JJ could be perfectly fine but 3betting a tight player with a tight EP opening range when we have a hand that dosnt do bad against that range is asking for problems.
If we decide to raise the flop we have to know the villain is bad enough to continue with worse or think we getting out of line and spazz out. Agagin against a tight player all we do is narrow his range, he is never folding better and folds all the stuff that we are ahead of essentially letting him play pretty much optimal poker against us.