Quote:
Originally Posted by sparks_mandrill
3-Bettign is something I know I still suck at. Just hasn't come up yet in my studies; focusing more on other fundamentals. I've heard that 3x the last bet is the standard 3-bet size, so I just did that roughly.
I bet the flop as a light c-bet because of how wide opponents ranges are and how they had played hands up to this point.
Does the added gutshot not also boost equity quite a bit?
Yeah, always go larger as more people enter the pot. And if you're OOP. If somebody opens 3BB PF and it folds to you IP, make it around 9BB. If there's a caller in between you make it 12BB. If there's two callers make it 15BB. If there's two callers and you're in the SB, make it 17-18BB, etc.
I didn't notice we were in the BB when I posted my first response, so going slightly larger than 18BB PF is probably better.
At any rate, there are a lot of problems with betting flop.
Don't forget the purpose of betting. Usually it's to do one of two things -- get value from worse hands, or bluff out better hands. Occasionally people also bring up something about realizing our equity or getting villain to fold their equity but I think it's tertiary to the other two purposes.
Are we betting to get value? Does Tx call a bet? Probably shouldn't. Does a straight draw call a bet? Probably shouldn't. Does a flush draw call a bet? Sure, but we block a lot of them and we're put in a really annoying spot OOP when they do call (or raise), and getting something with 35%+ equity to call isn't a huge win for us.
Are we betting as a bluff? Does Ax fold? They may actually fold some subset of their Ax's, but most of villains' Ax combos are going to continue. They are obviously continuing with two pairs and sets as well.
The problem is made even worse because we're 4-way. This is a pretty clear check to me in most HU spots, but now we add two more people who we aren't getting value from when we bet and we're not bluffing out of the pot when we bet... so what are we accomplishing? It's okay to c/f.