Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
26s should have folded pre 26s should have folded pre

03-26-2011 , 03:24 AM
meh, title is just to catch your attention.

villain is horrible. 65/0/1.9 135 hands.

this looks like either a boat, or a stupidly played Overpair.

are we stacking? bet/fold? check/call? bet/call? check/fold?

[converted_hand][hand_history]Poker Stars, $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 5 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #8466272

CO: $10 (100 bb)
BTN: $14.05 (140.5 bb)
SB: $11.79 (117.9 bb)
Hero (BB): $12.56 (125.6 bb)
MP: $10.78 (107.8 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 2 6
2 folds, BTN calls $0.10, SB folds, Hero checks

Flop: ($0.25) 4 3 5 (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $0.50, Hero raises to $1.70, BTN calls $1.20

Turn: ($3.65) 4 (2 players)
Hero bets $2.20, BTN calls $2.20

River: ($8.05) J (2 players)
Hero?
26s should have folded pre Quote
03-26-2011 , 03:35 AM
$3.5 turn shove river

edit: oh and lead flop + folding pre would be the worse poker play ever seen by the human race
26s should have folded pre Quote
03-26-2011 , 04:12 AM
I'm not folding a straight versus a 60/0 player, especially if he's just calling and not playing back against me. I'm putting him on an overpair or a set here.
26s should have folded pre Quote
03-26-2011 , 04:14 AM
the set beat us u see? plus there are a lot of trips even A5-66 kind of hands will have a hard time folding

never stop betting
26s should have folded pre Quote
03-26-2011 , 04:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidacao
the set beat us u see?
I'm quitting poker right now. lol
26s should have folded pre Quote

      
m