Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxhound32
Just stumbled upon this and scanned it pretty quickly. Lx, I'm surprised you're advocating a fold here. Granted there aren't many hands on the villain but it can be generally assumed that he's looser than average (if only relying on bayesian logic), and even tighter opponents at these stakes will play near all of the hands BAEV mentioned above in this manner. Are you discounting all of these hands when you compile the villain's range in this spot? Even if villain flopped top set, it wouldn't necessarily make getting it in here a bad play as a wide range of hands could be held that, over time, 66 is ahead of. Losing one pot doesn't mean folding a set every time you're played back at is a winning strategy.
This is the first thing ITT that I have agreed with 100%.
I am never ever ever folding here. He is unknown and could have all sorts of draws, plus the AK, AA, KT etc crap. We set mined for a reason and this flop is drawy.
By the way, did I miss a post of what happened OTT or are we still OTF?