Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
25NL Rush: Play along! 25NL Rush: Play along!

09-21-2010 , 08:20 PM
Checkraise larger on flop and try and get it in there and then. So many bad cards or draws that can come on turn and either scare him off or complete his hand.
25NL Rush: Play along! Quote
09-21-2010 , 09:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackRazor7
So your folding?
Is that not what I said?
25NL Rush: Play along! Quote
09-21-2010 , 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calad
If you put him on 60% KK when we have 66, what %KK does he have when we have TT? If you assign the same percentage, then it's safe to say that TT is an easy fold because we do not have the necessary equity to continue vs your assigned range. Either he is only doing this with the absolute nuts or he is doing this with any set (in your eyes) and your 2 posts say he is doing things differently. The point i am making here is be consistent in your logic and deduction of the hand because in some way your vision seems to have been clouded.



Here is what we know about him, Hero does not have many hands on villain and hero has been a reg at the stake for a couple weeks now, he is only playing 1 table of rush, and he has had some of the most awkward bet sizing known to poker. His stats do not seem TOO abnormal but couple that with these other things we know, do you still think it is not enough to make a read on him?
No, because whenever he has a set in this spot we are crushed. But when we have TT our equity soars to 40% (instead of 20%) - getting in is +EV here is it not with 40% equity due to the dead $$$ in the pot. There is a big diff between 40 and 20% equity in this spot. Treat him as shoving all in - we are investing 29.19 to win 47.44. This means we need 38% equity to break even on a call. Therefore TT is a call, 66 is a fold. My logic is perfectly consistent.
25NL Rush: Play along! Quote
09-22-2010 , 06:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lx12
No, because whenever he has a set in this spot we are crushed. But when we have TT our equity soars to 40% (instead of 20%) - getting in is +EV here is it not with 40% equity due to the dead $$$ in the pot. There is a big diff between 40 and 20% equity in this spot. Treat him as shoving all in - we are investing 29.19 to win 47.44. This means we need 38% equity to break even on a call. Therefore TT is a call, 66 is a fold. My logic is perfectly consistent.
Sorry, math is hard.

Still would like to know how you deduce these %s of ranges, though.
25NL Rush: Play along! Quote
09-22-2010 , 06:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calad
Sorry, math is hard.

Still would like to know how you deduce these %s of ranges, though.
Lol - just by my own guesstimation skills really. I think you should post the next step. I'm guessing you shoved and he showed you KK?
25NL Rush: Play along! Quote
09-23-2010 , 12:30 AM
Just stumbled upon this and scanned it pretty quickly. Lx, I'm surprised you're advocating a fold here. Granted there aren't many hands on the villain but it can be generally assumed that he's looser than average (if only relying on bayesian logic), and even tighter opponents at these stakes will play near all of the hands BAEV mentioned above in this manner. Are you discounting all of these hands when you compile the villain's range in this spot? Even if villain flopped top set, it wouldn't necessarily make getting it in here a bad play as a wide range of hands could be held that, over time, 66 is ahead of. Losing one pot doesn't mean folding a set every time you're played back at is a winning strategy.
25NL Rush: Play along! Quote
09-23-2010 , 03:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxhound32
Just stumbled upon this and scanned it pretty quickly. Lx, I'm surprised you're advocating a fold here. Granted there aren't many hands on the villain but it can be generally assumed that he's looser than average (if only relying on bayesian logic), and even tighter opponents at these stakes will play near all of the hands BAEV mentioned above in this manner. Are you discounting all of these hands when you compile the villain's range in this spot? Even if villain flopped top set, it wouldn't necessarily make getting it in here a bad play as a wide range of hands could be held that, over time, 66 is ahead of. Losing one pot doesn't mean folding a set every time you're played back at is a winning strategy.
This is the first thing ITT that I have agreed with 100%.

I am never ever ever folding here. He is unknown and could have all sorts of draws, plus the AK, AA, KT etc crap. We set mined for a reason and this flop is drawy.


By the way, did I miss a post of what happened OTT or are we still OTF?
25NL Rush: Play along! Quote
09-23-2010 , 05:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxhound32
Just stumbled upon this and scanned it pretty quickly. Lx, I'm surprised you're advocating a fold here. Granted there aren't many hands on the villain but it can be generally assumed that he's looser than average (if only relying on bayesian logic), and even tighter opponents at these stakes will play near all of the hands BAEV mentioned above in this manner. Are you discounting all of these hands when you compile the villain's range in this spot? Even if villain flopped top set, it wouldn't necessarily make getting it in here a bad play as a wide range of hands could be held that, over time, 66 is ahead of. Losing one pot doesn't mean folding a set every time you're played back at is a winning strategy.
In principle I agree with what you are saying, however (wait for it) - an aggrodonk like this normally bets big as bluffs and with medium strength hands. What does he bet small with? Monsters LDO. I don't normally advocate folding sets, especially not to aggrodonks, but when an aggrodonk takes a weak looking line, I'm very suspicious. I mean we've shown a willingness to get stacks in and despite this he is playing. He is expecting a call - let's disappoint him by folding
25NL Rush: Play along! Quote

      
m