PokerStars Zoom No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (6 handed) - PokerStars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

Button ($44.61)
SB ($10.05)
Hero (BB) ($9.13)
UTG ($10.30)
MP ($11.35)
CO ($21.97)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 10, 9
3 folds, Button bets $0.30, 1 fold, Hero raises to $0.90, Button calls $0.60

Flop: ($1.85) 4, K, 3 (2 players)
Hero bets $1, Button calls $1

Turn: ($3.85) A (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $1.80, Hero raises to $7.23 (All-In), Button calls $5.43

River: ($18.31) A (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: $18.31 | Rake: $0.82

Results:

Well this shove is probably going to look horrific.
I think the majority answer is gonna be 'fold pre' esp since this guy had $50+ where the max buyin is $10 which would suggest a certain level of skill.
I just didnt think there were that many hands that could call a shove since I'm representing AK, but oh well. Maybe AQ/AJ/A10, but you think those might fold on the flop.
Is it better to simply lead out and fold to a shove on the turn, and triple barrel shove on the river if called?

edit: or am i a victim of fancyplaysyndrome

It's a bluff not a value shove as his calling range would normally have you crushed.
$50 dollar stack doesn't mean skill, could just be a fish on a heater.

I think you can fold out some pairs but probably not folding a kx, ax.

Is this a bbv post?

I think just betting turn would be fine.

What do you know about villain?

You want him to be opening a very high amount of buttons and folding to lots of 3bets from the blinds to re-raise with T9o

You want a huge amount of fold equity on the turn to CRAI with no outs.

lighting money on fire

this is ******ed

what is this i don't even

fold pre, as played fold pre

It's not a valueshove.
That said I don't think it's as horrific as the others are saying.
I don't think he is betting a king for value.
he could have floated Ax, but many villains at these stakes will check behind even AQ there OTT. So the shove as a bluff might work prettty often.

The problem is that most of the time he checks behind so triple barreling is better that c/s here. And the second problem is that we have no equity. If we had even a gutshot, I'd be happier.