Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOJacob
I hear this kind of thing a lot but I don't really understand why. I get that from a GTO perspective I want my betting range to be balanced on the average turn card so it makes sense to barrel some hands with draws and, subsequently, equity.
But if my value range is big enough so that my 'bluffing' range is already balanced but could do with a few more combos, aren't combos with the lowest equity and best card removal the next best choice?
T high/9 high/8 high all would be bluffed before this.
It could be okay as an exploit but bluffing turns with no equity hands (you don't even have a diamond to bluff diamond rivers) is not the best strategy.
CO should be cbetting range here but if he does have a X back range. His X back range is going to be hands with SDV most likely.
I do like your sizing though. Usually when it goes X/X OTF we want to use 2 sizing's OTT. A small sizing and an OB sizing.
What do you think your value range is OTT? It's not nearly that big when you use that sizing - definitely not big enough to include a random JTo in there.