Thanks for providing players an opportunity for feedback. I understand the challenges of trying to juggle estimated tournament field sizes with available tables/dealers, while trying to create signature events and appeasing different groups of poker players (high/mid/low stakes tournament players, PLO players, PLO8 players, mixed game players, etc...).
One suggestion is to borrow an idea from PokerStars when they create their schedules. (They have been using the model for a couple years with their numerous tournament series.)
1. Release a tentative schedule. Mark the PDFs etc... as "tentative requesting player feedback".
2. Solicit feedback (2p2 thread, twitter, etc...) for a couple days to a week.
3. Release a final schedule.
This helps to build a more customer friendly reputation for the poker room.
Examples from their 2016 WCOOP:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/61...hread-1620481/
https://www.pokerstars.com/en/blog/o...d-162580.shtml
https://www.pokerstars.com/en/blog/o...t-162669.shtml