Quote:
Originally Posted by The4thFilm
Somehow bigger stacks with the same blind levels mean shorter stacks? Wat?
You have to read matt savage's article on page 2 to understand the concept, what tends to happen is the rate of people busting is clustered closer now to the middle and later stages of a tournament. in addition, lots more players will survive with short stacks making it possible the tournament will be less deep at the end.
its not really as applicable in this case because they offer a great structure and many starting chips.
its more applicable in say a tournament with 25K starting chips and 30 min levels versus a WSOP event with 4500 starting chips and 60 min levels. very few people will bust early in the 25k starting chip event but with the short levels the bustout rates are rapid right around the bubble and their is little bubble play.
at the wsop events bustout rates are more consistent and there is actual bubble play because of the long levels and shorter starting chips.
so sometimes less chips can be better. personally i like the 4500 chips and the ability to play very meaningful pots early or bluff someone in a meaningful pot early. much tougher to do in a 25k chip type event (or a 15k 25 25 event - still possible but less likely)
there is some merit in being able to bust in level 1 just playing normal poker.
i think more people will appreciate the less chips phenomenon eventually.
right now, most people go with more chips is better so its not a bad thing that places like borgata give them what they want.
this is also a really good tournament and a great structure. just pointing out the counter arguments for how less chips can actually be better.