Actually your opinion is sort of humorous because I don't see a single real movie made in the last twenty years staring Edward Norton that I'd be dying to see and most of the ones post 2000 he wasn't even the star .........
Meanwhile Wahlberg has been collecting paycheck after paycheck for ..........
If we compare the best movie either has been in Wahlberg probably wins with "The Departed" and even if we take the time they were head to head in "The Italian Job", Wahlberg probably wins.
Just because Wahlberg decides to star in movies like "Ted" doesn't make him a bad actor, it makes him not giving a sh*t and having a good time.
Norton is living in the glory years as being the unknown in Primal Fear, the second fiddle to Pitt in the greatly scripted Fight Club, or I guess in the case of a poker forum Rounders. Of course he had success in other films around that time and not denying they weren't good watches; American History X, The Score, even The Red Dragon, etc but he's hardly done much for the past two decades while Wahlberg has been printing money at the box office.
It doesn't matter much what you think though. The point was more to shine on that Norton wasn't all that much in the grand scheme of things than it was to bring Wahlberg to the top. Both have their place in hollywood but I don't think either really drive the "A" list and if one is to argue certainly Wahlberg trumps Norton in that category.