Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Let's Talk Watches Let's Talk Watches

07-03-2012 , 12:30 AM
Tricket- believe it is a Breitling Super Avenger?

Was hoping to get 2k for the Capeland but would settle at $1800 probably. Otherwise I'd just keep it. I just don't wear the darn thing and as I buy new pieces I'm trying to stay at a reasonable count.

By the way, the PAM 212 is sweeeet.
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-03-2012 , 03:18 AM
It's a Breitling Bentley for sure, from there you'd be guessing, but it is probably not a big date. Maybe the 6.75

The more I look at it the more I think it might be the GT, the 6.75 is a pretty big watch, 48mm or something, maybe 46.

Last edited by KPowers; 07-03-2012 at 03:25 AM.
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-03-2012 , 06:13 PM
Special Edition Mille for the One Drop trophy.



http://blog.perpetuelle.com/watches/...er-tournament/
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-04-2012 , 02:14 AM
whats up guys.

this watch def falls into the affordable category, but i am just getting my feet wet as far as watch collecting goes. i just picked up my first seiko 5 (automatic) that resembles the GS. i believe it is around 38 mm. it is in the mail, i should be receiving it in a few weeks.



i posted my first watch ITT about a month ago as a college grad gift to myself, but the photo was stock. here are some real shots. bulova marine star, 12 diamonds with a mother of pearl dial that is not visible in these pics.




i would appreciate it if you guys could recommend some other bands for either of these watches
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 03:14 AM
I like both of those
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 03:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sba9630
I'd go with the Orient over the Bulova, but if you're willing to spend $500, I'd go with something like this:

SEIKO Ref: SARB033 [seiyajapan.com - $494.00]
so sexy.... just bought one
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 01:03 PM
I don't really go for Hublot, personally, but I like this one better than most and had to post it just for pvn, because they aligned the screws this time:

Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 01:10 PM
Wow the screws are aligned, maybe Hublot is changing its ways?

This is much, much better than the other Hublot CF skeleton they came out with.

The strap is herpes though, but whatever, that **** is nice.
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReptileHouse
I don't really go for Hublot, personally, but I like this one better than most and had to post it just for pvn, because they aligned the screws this time:

Heh, thnx.

Chucknorristhumbsup.gif
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 03:09 PM
Is it wrong of me to hate Hublot?
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hfrog355
Is it wrong of me to hate Hublot?
nope, i do as well..

that's the first hublot i've ever seen that wasn't offensive... i'm sure the price probably is.
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 06:44 PM


I have this one. It was 400€ I think and I really like it. Wouldn't really feel comfotable wearing a watch any more expensive than that...
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 10:52 PM
Anyone got any suggestion for non-plastic and ugly watches with heart rate monitors? Thanks!
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 11:06 PM
Pretty sure there was a patek posted a couple of pages ago that might interest you.
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-05-2012 , 11:16 PM
I own one of these babies.





From between 1974-1978.
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-06-2012 , 05:03 AM
I'm not a Hublot fan, either
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-06-2012 , 06:50 PM
The Euro 2012 Hublot watches were pretty horrific IMO



Also available in red...
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-06-2012 , 07:34 PM
The blue is obviously terrible, but when I look at that my biggest issue is the not so subtle copy they did off AP. I've never been one that complained about the HBB/ROO similarities, and frankly I think Hublots in general look better

but look at that watch you just posted



What other watch besides these new APs has those giant ass pusher guards?

I'd think this was a case of Cadillac/GMC if I didn't know better. ****
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-07-2012 , 10:46 AM
Speaking of AP, I saw this the other day for the first time and thought it was incredibly cool.



http://www.hodinkee.com/blog/2012/6/...ks-to-ren.html
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-07-2012 , 04:35 PM
What does that have to do with AP? edit: got it

The numbers should line up on a $200,000 watch.

Quote:
Audemars Piguet Renaud & Papi, the complications wing of AP,
who is also quietly responsible for getting a significant percentage of hypercomplicated watches to work.
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-07-2012 , 05:23 PM
Yeah, sorry, I didn't exactly make that very clear. Lol @ numbers lining up - not sure if serious. It's not the prettiest watch I've ever seen but that wasn't my point!

Where did you get the $200k from? I didn't look for a price.
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-07-2012 , 06:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGrumpy
@ numbers lining up - not sure if serious.
In the vid the numbers didn't look like they lined up. Maybe it's the angle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGrumpy
Where did you get the $200k from?
Quote:
— only 16 pieces will be made (white gold or platinum case) —
the 4N watch price is a whopping 150,000 Euros (>$200,000).
http://blog.perpetuelle.com/watches/...ncois-quentin/
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-07-2012 , 10:14 PM
I think it depends on what you mean by "line up". If you're looking straight down at it I am pretty sure they all line up on the horizontal axis.
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-08-2012 , 12:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
If you're looking straight down at it I am pretty sure they all line up on the horizontal axis.
Did you watch the video above?
It appears to be straight on and the left minute number seems to be a little low and
the right minute number seems to be slightly crooked in the counterclockwise direction.
Let's Talk Watches Quote
07-08-2012 , 12:32 AM
pretty sure the camera in the video is slightly below the plane through the middle of the numbers and the offset you see is because one dial is beneath the other.
Let's Talk Watches Quote

      
m