Quote:
Originally Posted by Blarg
No Gordon Lish editing?
I almost wonder how that is possible, since so many editors work so closely with their authors at multiple stages of their works, and Lish doesn't have the reputation of being terribly passive.
The stories that make up this collection consist of three groups. Many of these stories were already published in little magazines or by small press publishers. A second group of stories had already been or were soon to be published in periodicals. The preface notes that Carver made some incidental revisions to those previous publications before sending them to Lish for editorial review. A third group, the smallest, involved a quite fresh set of stories.
The preface is unclear about how heavy a hand Lish had in those few tales making up the third group. So while I'm sure Lish would have had a hand in the development of the first two groups of stories if he had had the chance, they were previously published but not well known before he could have his say-so.
There is only one copy of the typed manuscripts that Carver sent to Lish and Lish then edited. The people working with Tess Gallagher, the wife and poet he left behind, spent years lifting the original manuscripts hidden underneath Lish's plethora of marks and notes.
Lish indeed had a heavy hand in the eventual product we are more familiar with. I knew going in that Lish was reported to have cut around 50% of the original manuscripts, but it is still quite shocking to see that in some cases entire sections of stories were removed. This is really quite fascinating.