Having people told their play was bad is healthy for play development.

I actually think the two most common angleshots are

1) Discussing ongoing games. In particular n00bs who have never been a wolf before. Suppose their first 5 games they rand villa, games 6 + 7 are ongoing. Somebody in game 7 asks if they have been a wolf before- this is a hard question to answer without hinting at your role in game 6.

2) Acknowledging that you angleshot. I remember in Homer's post restriction game Mets was accused of angleshooting and his reaction was something along the lines of "I wouldn't post that as a wolf to angleshot myself clear."

Perhaps the precise phrasing was different but the entire game I was rather confident that he was a villager, but couldn't clear him on anything other than the angleshoot so had to force myself to keep him on my wolf list anyway for the integrity of the game.

Basically I think that people shouldn't be allowed to say "anglesho(o)t" at all in WW games. It's like taking the elephant in the room and then feeding it HGH (or EGH?)

what rule did he break?

you're not dead until the mod says you are

I'm not saying it can't happen, but we're talking about a thread for suggesting that forum mods actually censure someone's behavior. I'm not going to give someone a werewolf ban for playing "bad"

You can explain to someone why their play was bad in the game thread

think of it like the werewolf court room, there are rules of order

ban turbos

yeah

i think we should be able to have a forum to discuss the most controversial ww players like systo + imp. why not have a thread just for that, no grievances or personal beefs allowed. you get into a back and forth with somebody in that thread you're asked to take it to PM, if you don't you're temp banned.

then as we evaluate individual cases we can come up with hard protocols to judge future instances.

anybody got a problem with this?

silly comparison is silly.

Slowpony.jpg

it was also a joke

lol ok sorry my joke detector got broked when they greened me.

well named

I agree.

Just saying post game talks are important -- people being told their play was bad and why is important.

I was afraid this would happen. Quick, say something stupid!

He didn't angleshoot though, and you only cleared him based on his reaction to the accusation he angleshot, which was incredibly villagery.

I didn't realize the mod had declared legend dead

that changes everything

in that case, legend did know he was dead

I suspect you're lying though

should I pull up the thread for evidence or do you concede?

I agree he shouldn't have posted

so did legend

that doesn't mean he cheated

its a 1 pt violation

if someone accues 5 in 2 months, then we know it's a huge problem

that's the point

i think it's super major

god it's hard to believe how much we used to disagree on things

i agree with all of this post 100%

yes

i purposely crossposted with binkles (we were both wolves) to stop the seer from getting his peeks out

and a villager posted "wtf binkles! maj night"

another villager posted something else

a third villager posted is that maj?

the 2nd villager then unvoted

and i was seeing all this in disbelief and reflexively unvoted as well

and then the thread got locked

who does that?

those posts all look pretty unimportant to me

false

it is clearing in that instance because we wolves majjed the seer and it basically outed both of us (we both did get lynched, donuts) so of course it does clear people. because me posting is the bigger offense to you, since i am the wolf.

and how can you say unvoting and saying "wtf binkles" isnt important. did you not read the game or do you just want to bust my chops

yeah, i think we can keep post game discussions for this and then maybe make a separate thread for the consistent problem children?

Majoritying the seer in xposts is wolfy, deal with it or don't do it ldo