Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
WW Court Version 1 - The Verdict WW Court Version 1 - The Verdict

07-12-2012 , 12:32 AM
Here is the link to where numbers LIES DIRECTLY about it being his first game as a defense for his actions.

Now what?

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=2205
07-12-2012 , 12:32 AM
Holy hell I totally forgot about the Dr. Seuss issue.

Can someone who has direct knowledge of that situation please PM me.
07-12-2012 , 12:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Oh well if he was a wolf then its one thing

I was under the impression he did it in a villa role.
even if he did it doesnt matter, godfather, etc. it is part of the game to ITA people when you can, even if it is a terrible shot to 99% of the thread.
07-12-2012 , 12:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krayz
both are equally terrible, who cares
lolno

saying "he conceded as a wolf at f21 and then the game made it down to f5 before the last wolf conceded due to villa angleshooting" is very, very different from the impression you conveyed
07-12-2012 , 12:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
woah wtf

ITA'ing a clear villa as a wolf and outing yourself is in no way shape or form a type of angleshoot. that is 100% allowed and part of the game.
iirc he had a good role, and the team clearly didn't want him to do that tho

just working off of my vague recollections here...
07-12-2012 , 12:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
woah wtf

ITA'ing a clear villa as a wolf and outing yourself is in no way shape or form a type of angleshoot. that is 100% allowed and part of the game.
This.
07-12-2012 , 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkey Banana
I'm not really a defender. I'd likely agree with everyone who is enraged bar dkgo, and I wouldn't cry if he got perma'd. But I think he does not need to appear to defend himself and it wouldn't serve any purpose. Most of us could write his posts for him because we all know he doesn't get it. I kind of like what chips says: give him a chance to get it. Chips is more tolerant because he's looking at something for the long term; I'm less so because I'm saying it's a suspended perma not a pass.

So next case mets?
why are you mentioning me here?
07-12-2012 , 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossnerd
Here is the link to where numbers LIES DIRECTLY about it being his first game as a defense for his actions.

Now what?

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=2205
HE LIED IN THE POST GAME TO AVOID PUNISHMENT BC HE KNEW AS MAGIC HED BE IN TROUBLE.

He flat out says this is his "FIRST FAME ON HERE".

PERMA BAN
07-12-2012 , 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix the Cat
I thought the first was determined to not be true? (allegedly)
yup

people are piling on and bullying itt because they have an easy target

in my opinion
07-12-2012 , 12:33 AM
lol at thinking magic reforms into a perfectly respectable pogger in time.

he makes a gimmick, and in his first game, he causes an incident. is it not clear that this is inherent to his nature? how many games has he played on pog? like a couple dozen?

bottom line: i do not enjoy playing with magic. very few people do. please don't inflict him on us. at some point, we, the respectable citizens of pog, should have the right to associate with whom we will.
07-12-2012 , 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
woah wtf

ITA'ing a clear villa as a wolf and outing yourself is in no way shape or form a type of angleshoot. that is 100% allowed and part of the game.
And then taking extra shots at people after using the ita limit and posting "**** it this isn't fun anymore"
07-12-2012 , 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarianceMinefield
he snap voted final 3 of MLP3

self voted pokemon and sort of spewed himself villager with that thread starting
These aren't violations of anything afaict. Just not optimal play.
07-12-2012 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vixticator
These aren't violations of anything afaict. Just not optimal play.
ya not violations. just annoying.
07-12-2012 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix the Cat
I'm gonna be pretty honest here, if I got back from work tomorrow to a community I moderately enjoy playing some games with sometimes and found that I was on "WW Trial" in a thread full of character assassinations, I'd probably react a bit heatedly.

I fully expect a heated reaction.

I also expect him to explain that he used the numbers-guy account because he felt magic_gazz was too tainted and wanted a fresh start. Which is his prerogative. Mets' ranting aside, unouted gimmicks are allowed as of right now. To say you're new at one point (because remember, this is a fresh start), and to say you're not new when asked again, is essentially outing yourself. Once you say you're not new, you're immediately pressured to out your previous or other accounts. If you're trying to effect a fresh start, that completely defeats the purpose.
I don't care about him posting on a gimmick account. I care about him ****ing up a game on a gimmick account and getting away with no punishment because no one knew that it was someone with a bad history. And then when he promptly ****s up a game on his other account he gets a slap on the wrist because no one knew it was actually the second game in a row that he'd ****ed up.
07-12-2012 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix the Cat
I'm gonna be pretty honest here, if I got back from work tomorrow to a community I moderately enjoy playing some games with sometimes and found that I was on "WW Trial" in a thread full of character assassinations, I'd probably react a bit heatedly.

I fully expect a heated reaction.

I also expect him to explain that he used the numbers-guy account because he felt magic_gazz was too tainted and wanted a fresh start. Which is his prerogative. Mets' ranting aside, unouted gimmicks are allowed as of right now. To say you're new at one point (because remember, this is a fresh start), and to say you're not new when asked again, is essentially outing yourself. Once you say you're not new, you're immediately pressured to out your previous or other accounts. If you're trying to effect a fresh start, that completely defeats the purpose.

And I can respect the desire for a fresh start. But you then can NOT wreck a game and ise the "new" excuse. To me that is the most upsetting part. Sometimes IRL stuff will harm a game. It is inevitable. But be straight about it in the postgame.
07-12-2012 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik Sedin
iirc he had a good role, and the team clearly didn't want him to do that tho

just working off of my vague recollections here...
yes it is a douchebag move, but more than once i have been getting heat in a mishmash and rather than risk getting lynched and having nothing good happen ill snipe a cleared villa in ita's.
07-12-2012 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix the Cat
I'm gonna be pretty honest here, if I got back from work tomorrow to a community I moderately enjoy playing some games with sometimes and found that I was on "WW Trial" in a thread full of character assassinations, I'd probably react a bit heatedly.

I fully expect a heated reaction.

I also expect him to explain that he used the numbers-guy account because he felt magic_gazz was too tainted and wanted a fresh start. Which is his prerogative. Mets' ranting aside, unouted gimmicks are allowed as of right now. To say you're new at one point (because remember, this is a fresh start), and to say you're not new when asked again, is essentially outing yourself. Once you say you're not new, you're immediately pressured to out your previous or other accounts. If you're trying to effect a fresh start, that completely defeats the purpose.
eh, i'll give you that, wrt why one might start a gimmick account.
07-12-2012 , 12:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
yup

people are piling on and bullying itt because they have an easy target

in my opinion
and i think you are taking the counter opinion without knowing many of the facts
07-12-2012 , 12:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix the Cat
I'm gonna be pretty honest here, if I got back from work tomorrow to a community I moderately enjoy playing some games with sometimes and found that I was on "WW Trial" in a thread full of character assassinations, I'd probably react a bit heatedly.

I fully expect a heated reaction.

I also expect him to explain that he used the numbers-guy account because he felt magic_gazz was too tainted and wanted a fresh start. Which is his prerogative. Mets' ranting aside, unouted gimmicks are allowed as of right now. To say you're new at one point (because remember, this is a fresh start), and to say you're not new when asked again, is essentially outing yourself. Once you say you're not new, you're immediately pressured to out your previous or other accounts. If you're trying to effect a fresh start, that completely defeats the purpose.
it is legal and i sent pms to wellnamed explaining how immoral a situation was going to be when somebody actually does this

i agree its legal. i still think lying and saying you are new is worth a temp ban or probation

but i hope that a hard rule comes into effect about it
07-12-2012 , 12:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
woah wtf

ITA'ing a clear villa as a wolf and outing yourself is in no way shape or form a type of angleshoot. that is 100% allowed and part of the game.
Lynch mob gonna lynch
07-12-2012 , 12:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
even if he did it doesnt matter, godfather, etc. it is part of the game to ITA people when you can, even if it is a terrible shot to 99% of the thread.
Well it was presented like he did it in order to disrupt the game

If not, then its whatevs
07-12-2012 , 12:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossnerd
HE LIED IN THE POST GAME TO AVOID PUNISHMENT BC HE KNEW AS MAGIC HED BE IN TROUBLE.

He flat out says this is his "FIRST FAME ON HERE".

PERMA BAN
FIRST FAME ON HERE!!!!!!!!!

i agree it's unfortunately not against the rules

as lame as it is
07-12-2012 , 12:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossnerd
HE LIED IN THE POST GAME TO AVOID PUNISHMENT BC HE KNEW AS MAGIC HED BE IN TROUBLE.

He flat out says this is his "FIRST FAME ON HERE".

PERMA BAN
That isn't even close to perma ban worthy, you just hate him.
07-12-2012 , 12:38 AM
Jenn, he's kind of backed into a corner if he's using a gimmick to get a break from his meta. Of course he's going to lie about it.
07-12-2012 , 12:39 AM
Are gimmicks required to out themselves in the postgame now?

      
m