I think we can safely unvote dyachie fwiw

I get the mechanic of targeting someone at night and seeing who they target the next night.

I don't get the mechanic of targeting an action.


Let's say Wahoo is a seer. You target Wahoo on N0. On N1 he peeks Ladd, and you see that he visited Ladd.

What else are you doing on N0? Targeting "roleblock", and you get a random notice on N2 that "somebody was roleblocked"?

yeah tonally they'd be doing pretty well as a wolf

I don't get the claim very well though, you saw wahoo target two players? But only one was from N1 and the other is yet to be determined?

Anyway, I think that wahoo was switched by Pry and received the backup role.

Since we have half a thread, plenty of time for me to read dead wolves, which I will do now

yes one is an unknown person at an indeterminate date

But who was he backing up? Who was dead n1?

it's not like that

lets say wahoo is a seer. On n1 he peeks ladd for immediate night. I dont see that

if wahoo is a future seer, on n1 he peeks ladd for n2. I get told wahoo visited ladd

if wahoo is a future seer, and on n1 he peeks ladd for n3. I get told wahoo visited someone on an indeterminate date

I'm assuming from my results it's a mix of the 2nd and 3rd results. I got told he visited ladd so that must be for n2. but he also visited someone else on an indeterminate night

Did wahoopride have the Contingency Plan role?

Or did someone else have the Contingency Plan role and when Yawn killed wahoopride, that wolf got wahoo's role and wahoo is revealed as he was.

I'm kind of warming up to the possiblity that dyachei tracked wahoopride (normal wolf role) to people, then when Yawn killed wahoopride he gets revealed as the CP role.

binkles has a pretty weird progression about apocps

oh wait I am stupid.

The role switch was on N0, his NA was on N1

Never mind me

So either dyachei made up the worst claim ever or wahoo won some NA as an event reward

I tend towards the latter

Wait I think he did get 3rd prize in some event, right? But ladd explicitly said wahoo didn't visit anyone

I derped, it was apoc, DZ, and RJ from the known event prizes

I guess he could have won some action from a duck, but that doesn't explain ladd saying wahoo didn't visit anyone

Ok, so binkles did not much else other than pushing dyachei and bakes

Gabe, give me an explanation for ladd stating he knew wahoo didn't visit anyone that allows for dya's claim to still be true

I found our second wagon.

Yeah, I had to rewind and find that ladd post

Seems we have a claim that cannot be true, but also is so absurd for a wolf to make up, I just cannot believe it.

It is kind of a coincidence that dyachei tracks wahoo, ladd tracks wahoo and wahoo targets ladd

I smell shenanigans

dya is a good player, right? a good player should have a good fake claim right?

like when i was wolf, my claim was so bad it was absurd lol

We have two people claiming to have tracked wahoopride to different targets. One is a dead villager whose information we know is good. Another is someone who claimed this role under pressure as a lead wagon yesterday.

These tracks should be part of their roles, so they should be processed at the same time. Getting different results doesn't make sense, which points to dyachei lying.

If dyachei is a lying wolf, why would he pick wahoopride as his track target? He knows wahoo is dying, his role is going to be revealed as Contingency Plan, and that the lack of actions in his write-up is points against him.

His choice doesn't make sense. But his choice is also dead, and might be part of the reason he picked him.

Furthermore, dyachei claims the track prior to ladd claiming it. He had know way of knowing he would get counterclaimed. Then the wolves put three dayvigs instantly on ladd. I think this is what seals it for me.

idk i guess we have to kill dya

dyachei

[QUOTE_wahoopride]I would expect you'd have to block the kill up front but you should be able to angel a person and prevent them from dying. I would say it is up to the angel to interpret how their role would work on a delayed kill but obv I'd save insanity if I thought I could.[/QUOTE]
This a wolf saying that insanity should be saved. Remember I said yesterday he should NOT be saved. All these dayvigs of today ought to give you an idea about the why. Its probably creating unhealthy paradoxes.

dyachei