Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Werewolf LC Thread Werewolf LC Thread

03-27-2014 , 05:12 AM
Quote:
You are an Angel. Every night you may choose a player and that player can not be killed that night. You may not choose the same player two nights in a row
This is the standard wording.
Suppose Player A is targeted by the Night Angel, but the night action is moved to Player C by a Redirector or a Randomizer.

1) What happens if the Angel targets Player C the following night?
2) What happens if the Angel targets Player A the following night (he is dumb or he learned that his NA was moved)

If you say in 1) that the Night Action goes through, will you tolerate a wolf team Angel + Redirector angeling the same person every night?

I am using the following wording:
Quote:
You are an Angel. Every night you may choose a player and that player can not be killed that night, unless that player was angeled the night before
This makes randomizing/redirection a nobrainer and fixes the potential brokenness of a game with multiple angels (Village Odd+Even Angel, for example)
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 05:23 AM
I would say that the Angel cannot target the same player two nights in a row, and it's not his fault if something happens after he submits.

I would deal with the wolf issues in other ways. Personally I would never include a wolf angel in any game that I design, so I would never have to worry about it. But if I were a consultant for a game where this could be an issue, I'd put a restriction on the wolf redirecter so that he cannot use his powers on a wolf.

I suppose this still leaves open the possibility of a village angel and village redirecter working together to circumvent the restriction, but if the village redirecter knows who the angel is then it seems like the wolves ought to be able to get around this problem by just killing the angel.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 05:55 AM
What don't you like about the wolf angel role?
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 10:06 AM
The post restriction should be something like "you may not have more than 1 post more than the next highest posting player." That way you dont have a spammer clogging the thread with nonsense. It would also be elite for an "added" wolf power since you could silence the top poster on d3 if you have the following post counts and killed the guy in 2nd: 365, 364, 248. This possibility would (or at least should) lead to a handful of posters determining the upper bound of participation since straying from the pack with another 1-2 people would be dangerous.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 11:02 AM
one post more lol
CDL stop using hallucinating substances

Quote:
Originally Posted by XXX
"FIRST"
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXX
"YES, I AM FIRST"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mod
XXX got modkilled for having two posts more than the rest
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 11:55 AM
that XXsooted always getting modkilled

but I think CDL meant at EOD
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenC
Kruze is totally right, sign-up threads have become embarrassing to read.

I don't think postcount is an accurate metric to indicate ones involvement in the game, either you slank or don't. Someone posting a lot is just their style of play, I don't see any reason to handicap these people, big games will always have big threads, deal with it. It's not like Noze is suddenly going to read the thread if it's 15% smaller.
Just to throw in my 2 cents... as someone who had ALWAYS read the thread (multiple times every game) in the past... I don't even bother to try to read day 1 in a mish mash anymore, and sometimes even day 2... I read like 2 pages to get a feel for opening posts and then interact with what's going on around me at the time and that's IT. VMF called me a wolf once (when I was a villager) because I said I couldn't be bothered... no offense, but ww worked just as well when we had 9 page threads... Now I'm VERY lucky if they are under 9 pages when I finally get online around 12-1 day 1.

So while Noze might not read the thread, plenty of good players that can't be bothered now, would read it.

It'd be fun to have some PoR games where the post restriction is obscenely low compared to what is the new normal... 10 PPD or something... And don't get me wrong, I like to post and interact... I love the social aspect of ww... But people are complaining about sign-up's not filling and the like... I wouldn't be surprised if the spam fest is a huge part of that.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurp Durpington
I'd like to see a all lawyah 13er go
Can we get a list of outed lawyers? Might be enough for a mash.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:14 PM
hoayah
gadahrene
lkj(ah?)
diskohteque
muttigah(?)
elliotrah

if there are unouted lawyahs lurking identify yourselves and we won't hurt you
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:15 PM
Mutigers is not even yet in law school, I'm pretty sure. There's still time for him to save himself.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurp Durpington
hoayah
gadahrene
lkj(ah?)
diskohteque
muttigah(?)
elliotrah

if there are unouted lawyahs lurking identify yourselves and we won't hurt you
me gadarene hoya and karak all went to the same school too im pretty sure
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:17 PM
post restrictions and ITAs don't go together too well, so I am not sure post restrictions will work after day 1 in mish mashes unless you make them like 150
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:17 PM
post restriction is much easier to monitor than word restriction, but the latter would be much more effective. Word bombs take much more time to read and process than 20 one liners.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diskoteque
me gadarene hoya and karak all went to the same school too im pretty sure
hope it wasn't T14 because you guys could singularly bump it out.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:19 PM
I bet if you try hard you can decode which school Hoya went to.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zayana
Just to throw in my 2 cents... as someone who had ALWAYS read the thread (multiple times every game) in the past... I don't even bother to try to read day 1 in a mish mash anymore, and sometimes even day 2... I read like 2 pages to get a feel for opening posts and then interact with what's going on around me at the time and that's IT. VMF called me a wolf once (when I was a villager) because I said I couldn't be bothered... no offense, but ww worked just as well when we had 9 page threads... Now I'm VERY lucky if they are under 9 pages when I finally get online around 12-1 day 1.

So while Noze might not read the thread, plenty of good players that can't be bothered now, would read it.

It'd be fun to have some PoR games where the post restriction is obscenely low compared to what is the new normal... 10 PPD or something... And don't get me wrong, I like to post and interact... I love the social aspect of ww... But people are complaining about sign-up's not filling and the like... I wouldn't be surprised if the spam fest is a huge part of that.
I like where you are going with this, but the bolded is belied by the fact that the biggest games which are the ldo biggest spamfests (Anniversary, Harry Potter, MtG, etc) tend to never have trouble getting people to sign up. It seems to be the smaller mashes that have trouble generating enough signups to run.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurp Durpington
hoayah
gadahrene
lkj(ah?)
diskohteque
muttigah(?)
elliotrah

if there are unouted lawyahs lurking identify yourselves and we won't hurt you
atakdoggah
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LKJ
Mutigers is not even yet in law school, I'm pretty sure. There's still time for him to save himself.
We need to work harder and together to talk him out of it imo
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashington
I like where you are going with this, but the bolded is belied by the fact that the biggest games which are the ldo biggest spamfests (Anniversary, Harry Potter, MtG, etc) tend to never have trouble getting people to sign up. It seems to be the smaller mashes that have trouble generating enough signups to run.
Don't you get a ton of people signing up for those games out of a sense of obligation or whatever and slank/go UTR/not read thread?
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:25 PM
man i ****ing love lkj's dry lawyer humor
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashington
I like where you are going with this, but the bolded is belied by the fact that the biggest games which are the ldo biggest spamfests (Anniversary, Harry Potter, MtG, etc) tend to never have trouble getting people to sign up. It seems to be the smaller mashes that have trouble generating enough signups to run.
Part of this is that people are willing to gear up a few times a year for these biggest/traditional games and can't do it most of the time, so the thought process is "joy, another spam fest, I think I'll pass and save my self-loathing for later"

Part of this is that people want to sign up for these games because they're big games, but really still don't want to read that crap, so game play suffers as a result because half the people spam and half the people are signed up but not reading jack **** because ain't nobody got time for that, and what emerges, while an interesting social experiment, isn't really related to werewolf in a meaningful way
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurp Durpington
man i ****ing love lkj's dry lawyer humor
Spoiler:
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
post restriction is much easier to monitor than word restriction, but the latter would be much more effective. Word bombs take much more time to read and process than 20 one liners.
we* have the tools...


*Chips
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkDonkDonkDonk
Don't you get a ton of people signing up for those games out of a sense of obligation or whatever and slank/go UTR/not read thread?
Well you're going to have that in every mash, I think. It has certainly been the case in every one I've ever played anyway.

Sometimes people have good intentions when they sign up but then real life gets in the way. But you're always going to have slankers imo no matter what.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote
03-27-2014 , 01:29 PM
this is what happens when you have post restrictions (all within 13 min of it being lifted in a game with like 7 people left). Similar word bombs were dropped earlier in the day to make sure everyone could say what they wanted:

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimHalpert
MOD NOTE

The post restriction has been lifted. Due to vote only posts, nobody is over the restriction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top Tier Tom
On the way home from work I realized I should prove something to myself: that I'm not misclearing anyone. So I got home, found the WW database, and did some #homwork.

THIS IS MY LIST OF PEOPLE YOU ARE NEVER ALLOWED TO LYNCH. DO NOT LET THE WOLVES TOUCH ANY OF THESE PLAYERS, FOR ANY REASON.

FIRST: BHUBER.

WHY BHUBER IS NEVER A WOLF HERE AND I WONT LET HIM BE MISLYNCHED

CLIFFS: BHUBER IS A SCARED, LURKY WOLF. HE IS AN OUTSPOKEN, RAMBLING, STREAM OF CONSCIOUSNESS VILLAGER. AS A WOLF HE SPEAKS AS LITTLE AS HE CAN GET AWAY WITH. AS A VILLAGER HE SPEAKS AS MUCH AS WE CAN PUT UP WITH. HE LACKS CONVICTION IN HIS TONE WHEN HE IS WOLFING. HE IS MUCH MORE ENGAGED IN GAMESOLVING AND SHOWS ABUNDANT CURIOSITY AS A VILLAGER AND YOU CAN FOLLOW HIS THOUGHT PROCESS ALMOST IN REAL TIME.

RECENT BHUBER WOLF GAME





























--------------

A RECENT BHUBER VILLAGE GAME







































WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HIS WOLF GAME AND HIS VILLA GAME? AS A WOLF HE IS ****ING SCARED. SORRY BHUBER BUT YOU SUCK AT WOLFING. AS A VILLAGER HE SAYS WHATEVER **** COMES TO HIS MIND AND HIS THOUGHT PROCESS IS ABSURDLY TRANSPARENT. AS A VILLAGER, YOU CAN TELL WHAT HE ATE FOR BREAKFAST BY THE WAY HE POSTS. AS A WOLF, YOU CAN TELL HE **** HIS PANTS BEFORE PRESSING "SUBMIT REPLY." HE ALSO IS EAGER TO CLEAR VILLAS RIGHT AWAY SO HE CAN GET HIS POE GOING.

BHUBER IS NOT A WOLF IN THIS GAME. DO NOT LYNCH HIM.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top Tier Tom
SECOND: PERDITION.

WHY PERDITION IS NEVER A WOLF HERE AND I WONT LET HIM BE MISLYNCHED

CLIFFS: PERDITION IS A ****TY, SCARED WOLF. IN CONTRAST, HE IS A ****TY, OBNOXIOUS VILLAGER. HE JUST DOESN'T KNOW WHAT THE **** TO SAY WHEN HE IS A WOLF. HE TRIES TO EMULATE HIS VILLAGER GAME BY BEING CASUAL AND JOKEY BUT FAILS MISERABLY. AS A VILLA HE DOESN'T GIVE A **** WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT HIM AND WHEN HE THINKS HE HAS THE GAME SOLVED HE JUST TUNNELS FOR THE REST OF THE GAME. WHEN HE IS A VILLAGER HE ABSOLUTELY BELIEVES WHAT HE IS SAYING AND ANYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH HIM CAN **** OFF.

HIS PHRASING IS ALSO QUITE AWKWARD AS A WOLF.

MOST RECENT PERDITION WOLF GAME





























SUMMARY: TRYING TO CONVINCE PEOPLE THAT A VILLAGER IS A WOLF WHILE MAKING HIMSELF SOUND INSANELY FAKE. HE HAS NONE OF THE "OOMPH" THAT HE DOES AS A SNARKY VILLAGER.

--------------

A RECENT PERDITION VILLAGE GAME




























CLIFFS: SNARKY, DISINTERESTED IN ENGAGING THE THREAD OTHER THAN TO CALL PEOPLE WHO QUESTION HIM IDIOTS.

IN CASE YOU ARE NOT CONVINCED HERE IS ANOTHER GAME WHERE PERDITION PLAYS AS A VILLA UNDER A GIMMICK







































SUMMARY: HE IS A SNARKY PRICK AND IS DOING THE SAME "D1 SUCKS AND I AM ALWAYS MISLYNCHED SO MAY AS WELL GET IT OVER WITH" SCHTICK THAT HE'S DOING IN THIS GAME. HE SOUNDS MUCH MORE NATURAL THAN HE DOES WHEN HE'S WOLFING.

PERDITION IS NOT A WOLF IN THIS GAME. DO NOT LYNCH HIM.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top Tier Tom
THIRD: MUCKS.

WHY MUCKS IS NEVER A WOLF HERE AND I WONT LET HIM BE MISLYNCHED

CLIFFS: MUCKS IS A HARD-HEADED HARD-DEFENSIVE VILLAGER. HE IS A WISHY-WASHY WOLF. HE ALSO READS ME WELL AND I FEEL I READ HIM WELL; HE'S GIVEN ME STRONG VILLA VIBES SINCE SUBBING IN, EVEN IGNORING MY VILLA READ ON REDD.

MUCKS MOST RECENT WOLF GAME









































--- FAST FORWARD TO HIS FINAL F3 SHOWDOWN AS A WOLF ---



































SUMMARY AS A WOLF: WISHY-WASHY, MORE PASSIVE, DOESN'T YELL WHEN HE'S ATTACKED.
WHEN HE WAS A WOLF IN F3 AT THE END OF ROCKY HORROR INSTEAD OF INSISTING HOW INNOCENT HE IS, HE WENT BACK INTO THE THREAD TO FIND FACTS TO SUPPORT HIM AND HAD TROUBLE INTERACTING IN REAL TIME. HE KEPT SOFT DEFENDING HIMSELF WITH STATEMENTS LIKE "YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING" INSTEAD OF HIS VILLAGER DEFENSES A LA "I AM NEVER A WOLF HERE."


--------------

MUCKS RECENT VILLA GAME [WHERE I MISLYNCHED HIM]



















































SUMMARY AS A VILLA: GETS BITCHY WHEN PEOPLE ACCUSE HIM OF BEING A WOLF WHEN HE'S NOT. SEE THE DIFFERENCE? HE'S BEEN DOING THE SAME THING IN THIS GAME WHEN CDL OR SOAH GET @ HIM.

MUCKS IS NOT A WOLF IN THIS GAME. DO NOT LYNCH HIM.
Quote:
Originally Posted by soah
I really can't follow along with what you think you have against me here. What separates a villager with reads from a wolf with reads?

Was it Redd that I was talking about in #1? Whoever it was, I'd read them as villagery for whatever reason that I've long since forgotten and don't care to go back and figure out right now, but the lock clearing thing based off of bad reasoning was something I decided to comment on. Or whatever it was exactly that was said. The mindmeld thing is something I see used often and it's pretty bad, and I generally like to educate people and I want people to play well. So I made that post but it was important to also mention that I wasn't necessarily disagreeing with the conclusion. As best I can remember, I made that post while catching up in the thread so my reads at that time were just basic impressions of who had said something villagery at some point, and who had said something sketchy at that point. Redd was in the pile of people who had said something I'd liked. If it's really really important, I could go back and backtrace my logic, but this whole thing seems super silly since you're questioning me about a villager lean I'd had on someone early in the game at a point when he'd made enough posts to get a read on him and when other people had the same read.

With #2, again, I don't see the issue. As a rule of thumb, I don't talk about my villager reads on d1 unless I need to save them or it otherwise comes up in the conversation, and I also don't talk a lot about my reads in general until later in the day so that they have more time to gel before I start locking things in. Otherwise, look at what happened between me and iversonian in this game and then multiply it tenfold. Reads are very fluid early in the game and things change a lot. If I were to keep everyone updated on my reads at all times, I'd end up just flooding the thread to document every little change based on each post I read, and the first batch of reads are generally barely better than random anyway, so what's the point. For various reasons, many of them obvious, I don't want to play that way.

I thought it was reasonable to read Pimp as wolf based on page 1, and I posted about this largely because tappo was going after someone for thinking Pimp was wolfy on page 1, but then once he started posting later in the day he was really engaged and seemed interested and he was harassing me for -- in a nutshell -- not going after the same people as him. So he was villagery, and wolves generally aren't that active in trying to build consensus around their wolf reads like that, and especially not when the villager is me, and he had the right degree of accusation against me in his tone while he was doing it. It was really quite hard to see him being a wolf there. So when wn subbed for him and claimed wolf, I made a joke about it. The opportunity was too good to pass up. Plus there was suspicion still on pimp at that time I think, so getting a dissenting opinion out there can't hurt as far as maybe guiding opinions in the other direction due to groupthink and people wondering what's causing me to have the reads that I have... which is my preferred way of playing d1 as a villager and which has been pretty consistent in my village games for a few years now.

For posterity, I'll guess that pimp was vyk.

And the last line of your post, which I cut out but will include here: "by basically clearing villagers in awkward spots 4lyfe when they perceive them to be really villagery" --- In the first example, I was certainly not hardclearing whoever it was. ReddBoiler? Like I obviously don't have him as cleared right now, and I never said he was clear in that post, and I doubt I would have said it in any other post. And as for wn, I've continued to cite more and more reasons for him to be a villager as the game has progressed. The first post itself wasn't even necessarily hardclearing him: I included a question mark on it. I think that to a certain extent I was curious to see how he'd respond to it (and the question mark invites a response), not that I actually had any plan of how to read the response. Way too much time has passed now for me to remember the EXACT strength of my read on pimp at the time that he subbed out, but I'm pretty sure it was somewhere in the ballpark of "he seems like a really obvious villager right now but it's always dangerous to lock clear someone based on a single reading of their posts in realtime".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top Tier Tom
QUOTES OF SOAH AS A WOLF IN ANOTHER GAME: 1/31 Vanilla WW Game - The Culture: Excession

CLEAR SIMILARITIES THAT I SEE:

1. AMBIGUOUS REASONING FOR WHY SOMETHING IS WOLFY

















2. REFUTING THAT SOMETHING IS TRUE WITHOUT STATING WHY











3. FLAT QUESTIONING THAT DOESN'T GO ANYWHERE









4. TRYING TO TRIP PEOPLE UP WITH THEIR OWN WORDING






























5. OVER-EXPLAINS IN WAYS THAT DON'T ADD TO HIS ARGUMENT BUT "LOOK" IMPRESSIVE












THIS BEHAVIOR IS EXTREMELY CONGRUENT WITH HIS BEHAVIOR IN THIS GAME.

HE HAS AWESOME TONE AS A WOLF BUT HE RELIES MORE ON TRIPPING PEOPLE UP RATHER THAN TAKING A "BATTERING RAM" APPROACH TO MISLYNCHING VILLAGERS HEAD-ON.

HE LETS WOLFY VILLAGERS DO THE WORK FOR HIM. IT'S GRACEFUL, BUT NOT THAT HARD TO PICK UP ON SINCE I'M USED TO SEEING POWER WOLVES ON OTHER FORUMS AND THE TACTICS HE HAS USED IN THIS GAME REMINDED ME A LOT OF THINGS I'VE PERSONALLY DONE AS A WOLF.

WE HAVE TO LYNCH SOAH TODAY
Quote:
Originally Posted by soah
Also, bhuber, in some post you said that I was asserting I'm the villager and Tom is wolf because I've been right and he's been wrong. That's really not it at all. It's the WAY that he's been wrong, and the way that I've been right.

It's the way that he takes things and twists them, the way that he lies, the way that he ignores all common sense. Like he says that CDL is bussing in this game to exploit his meta. That is not a read. That is not logic. There is absolutely no way that someone playing opposite of their wolf game is evidence against them. This should be obvious on its face. Yet this is Tom's counterargument to everything... can't discount Hero/ivers wolf team because no way to prove a noob wolf wouldn't bus on d1... etc. He claims that he can read people perfectly and pwn the game, yet also keeps asserting that you can't ever rule anything out from the wolves because they'll do anything at all to trick you, with no regard for how bad of a strategy it is. He alternates between these viewpoints depending on which is convenient at the time. He's blatantly contradictory in his standards and his reads. He alludes to having tons of evidence to support his reads, but when backed into a corner the best he can do each time is to just repeat the same one bad argument he'd already been making. About me, and about CDL. He noted early d1 that I wasn't participating much. He has refused to evaluate that conclusion over the course of seven days. Despite the fact that it was blatantly untrue, he continued to assert it as basically the only case against me.

Then you have all of the coincidences. tappo basically says he's going after Hero Value d2, then goes to bed. Out of nowhere, Tom goes hardcore on tappo to get him lynched. Tom has referred to my strategy guides many times. One of the biggest things I talk about in the wolf guide is looking ahead and seeing who will be clear later in the game, and mislynching them before they can get clear. If Tom is a villager, then it is a big coincidence that he did exactly what the optimal wolf play was in that spot. I asked him why he did it, and the timing of it, and he didn't have much answer. Hero has been the only wolf in Tom's wolf list all game. Hero is the only person in his wolf list that Tom never went hard at. Tom had Hero as wolfy d1 yet attacks wn for having Hero as a wolf. Tom explicitly cites the fact that tappo has Hero as a top wolf suspect as a justification for lynching tappo. d2, he derails the Hero wagon at eod and never talks about the guy. d3, he fights against the Hero wagon. Is it a coincidence that Tom has protected the only actual wolf on his wolf list while going all-out against all of the villagers on his wolf list?


Compare this to the way that I have been right about people in this game. I attacked iversonian. He responded to it a bunch and voted me. People took my side, made him the lead wagon. I stepped back, rethought it, moved my vote, and ended up arguing against lynching him later in the game, despite knowing that he was just going to keep showing up and voting me each day. I attacked jay, he also voted me back, and there again I also backed off and reconsidered it, instead moving on and pissing off even more people in the game. [Contrast this with Tom who has, without fail, tried to lynch everyone who calls him a wolf in this game.... or who calls Hero Value a wolf. And the his response is always directly proportional to how strongly they are attacking him or Hero Value. As I'm writing this, I'm realizing how much of a coincidence it also is that his wolf reads at the very start of d2 were people who had Hero Value as a wolf on d1.]

I have begged people to explain why they disagree with me. I wanted to know why jay or whoever it was at the time was being read as villagery. I went through and debated the points in the thread. Thought about, decided my case might not be so ironclad, backed off. At one point d2 I specifically asked wn to give me his thoughts on something. I've laid out lots of evidence in plain sight to make sure that everything is transparent. I asked other people to get their thoughts in on #1598 first.

This is not how I wolf. When I'm a wolf, I have my agenda, and it needs to be taken care of so that we can win the game. I post my cases and pursue them aggressively. I do not beg people to explain their counterarguments. I do not move off of a mislynch that I've set up, and put myself in a position where I'll be stuck hard-defending him all game as he shows up once a day to vote me. I do not invite other people to get in the first word on a topic that I consider important. I do not beg people to reread sections of the game thread when I can instead just selectively quote the parts of it that make me look the best, hoping no one reads the rest of it. I do not post links to my previous wolf games and then call people out for not researching me. And I do not throw myself in front of an egomaniac like Tom who is leading mislynches for me and trying to lynch all who oppose him. Literally the whole reason I am a suspect in this game is because of those VILLAGERY things I've done. Backing off of iversonian instead of just getting him out of the way d1, which means he's on my wagon d2. Getting in Tom's way so that he demands that I be lynched. If I'm a wolf, this is the easiest game ever for me. I even posted on d2 saying that I wished I were a wolf in this game. I posted that at the time that I was being lynched. What does that tell you? If I were a wolf, I would never be getting heat in this game. I'd let Tom win it all for me. So let's repeat this again just to make sure it's abundantly clear: I am getting lynched or near-lynched in this game solely because of actions I took which were directly pro-village, trying to avoid mislynches. Tom will argue that I'm trying to exploit my meta by playing how I don't normally play as wolf, to use it in my defense. This is abundantly ******ed. Playing the straightforward way would have won this game. Playing this way would have lost. I value winning the game a lot more than I value mixing up my play so that I can reward myself by bussing my team and then ending up lynched myself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by soah
mucks,

You continue to post stuff that is absolutely ridiculous. You say I was sitting back and letting Tom lead the lynches. The lynch on d2 was DAMN NEAR ME. So, I just sat back to let myself get lynched... and that's wolfy... or something. wat. You have clearly not read that passage of the game, and have ignored multiple posts that I've made about it, where I WAS TRYING TO GET HERO LYNCHED, AND TOM DERAILED IT IN FAVOR OF A WAGON ON ME.

Also, you're saying that you're 100% sure Perdition is a villager. Yet yesterday, I quoted his first post from today, and said it basically outed him (well, I did't put it that way). You quoted my post and agreed that it looked terrible for him. So, how can you have him as lock clear? You have offered no explanation for this. I have quoted dozens of posts from his village games which look nothing like anything he's done in this game. I quoted the posts from his wolf game which don't look substantially different from his posts in this game. You did not address them.

well named has demanded that the people voting me make a case against me. You have not. You assert that some people are villagers, the others are wolves by POE, yet you give little explanation of why the remaining players are not clear. You claim my posts are bull****, but you don't respond to them to show why. You AGREED that Perdition's first post today was horribly wolfy. You don't seem to want to take responsibility for actually calling me a wolf, so you just pass off the blame onto Tom. This is the fifth consecutive IRL day in which you have engaged in this behavior, and your posting about me makes it clear that you haven't even researched what I have done in this game.

You have also generally failed to respond to the fact that well named is an obvious villager who has seven years of experienced with me and is dead certain that I am a villager. I explicitly brought this to your attention. You have not commented on it. XXSooted has years of experience with me and hardcleared me. jay is a villager who was NKed after hardclearing me. WN is an obvious villager who has hardcleared me. So even disregarding CDL, you cannot deny that villagers are saying that I am literally never a wolf in this game. You do not address this issue, despite your repeated assertions that you don't trust yourself to read me. You and Perdition are the only ones who are certain that Tom is a villager. bhuber isn't even sure about it anymore. So literally the only person who shares your assessment of Tom is a guy who shows up sometimes and does nothing and has posted basically no thoughts or reasoning at all. And the others think I'm an obvious villager.
click through to see some of the multiquotes that take 10 min or more to read each. Post restrictions don't solve the unreadable thread issue.
Werewolf LC Thread Quote

      
m