Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
There's too much WW in POG There's too much WW in POG

04-02-2012 , 07:21 PM


I used my artistic visualization to summarize this thread

Last edited by essedarius; 04-02-2012 at 07:29 PM.
04-02-2012 , 07:24 PM
we don't actually "have to" change minimum participation rules. If some subset of the player pool wants more serious competitive werewolf with different rules, mods are pretty welcome to run games

I don't think you should assume that everyone in POG actually wants that or that we "have to" change what has been the predominant rule for many years. It's sort of like if I came into SE and started a thread about how the SEer culture was too hostile and you guys had to sort out all your overly nasty posters so I could enjoy participating
04-02-2012 , 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
I don't think you should assume that everyone in POG actually wants that or that we "have to" change what has been the predominant rule for many years. It's sort of like if I came into SE and started a thread about how the SEer culture was too hostile and you guys had to sort out all your overly nasty posters so I could enjoy participating
Fair comment, and its quite possible that i'm wrong and that the majority of POG are happy playing uncompetitive (in part) WW. But I think it's also fair to admit that there is some section of POG who agree with me. I dont think the thread gets this big if everyone thinks i'm talking complete rot.

In either case, its a conversation worth having.

--

I urge you to make the SE thread.
04-02-2012 , 07:31 PM
are there cliffs on this thread anywhere?
04-02-2012 , 07:32 PM
my name has been mentioned AND I DON'T LIKE IT
04-02-2012 , 07:33 PM
Cliffs:

Little BAIDS at the start.

Little more BAIDS in the middle.

Total BAIDS atm.
04-02-2012 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tehtoes
my name has been mentioned AND I DON'T LIKE IT
WHAT YOU GONAN DO ABOUT IT.
04-02-2012 , 07:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
are there cliffs on this thread anywhere?
did you miss my totp or was it not good enough for you?
04-02-2012 , 07:37 PM
Aksdal, you F3ing br0?
04-02-2012 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by essedarius
did you miss my totp or was it not good enough for you?
I read the first 25 posts or so, so yes i missed it.
04-02-2012 , 07:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
I read the first 25 posts or so, so yes i missed it.
But it's on this page

Sorry, I'm just trolling you. It's pretty much like every similar thread that has been made about WW. There's not really any issues, but we're discussing about it anyways. Or we're discussing about things that have been discussed million of times before, but nothing ever chances like biggerboat said on 1st page.
04-02-2012 , 08:02 PM
oh, youre totp is solid. I agree with the premise that most people should not be allowed to play multiple games at a time. It is rare that people read the thread once much less reread these days and unless youre already doing that and posting a lot of substance it is fair to say you could add a lot more to the game you are in. when this is the case it isnt right to join another game.
04-02-2012 , 08:29 PM
i like gadardene and met him in real life and i think he's a nice guy but he hated on me in a game and thought i was being a dick too. all i was trying to do was discern his role
04-02-2012 , 08:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
are there cliffs on this thread anywhere?

i actually miss you cdl

no jopke
04-02-2012 , 08:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
oh, youre totp is solid. I agree with the premise that most people should not be allowed to play multiple games at a time. It is rare that people read the thread once much less reread these days and unless youre already doing that and posting a lot of substance it is fair to say you could add a lot more to the game you are in. when this is the case it isnt right to join another game.
there might have to be overlap. like you want to sign up for a game that starts in a week and you dont know when you will be dead in this one

but that shouold be it

/12 pages ago
04-02-2012 , 08:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
there might have to be overlap. like you want to sign up for a game that starts in a week and you dont know when you will be dead in this one

but that shouold be it

/12 pages ago
iF youre alive 24 hours before the other game starts then out and get on the sub list imo
04-02-2012 , 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
iF youre alive 24 hours before the other game starts then out and get on the sub list imo
That sometimes ruins games tho
04-02-2012 , 11:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeLady
I mean, I dislike when people bring excessive amounts of emotion into a ww game. I was at ML recently as a wolf and we pretty much had 2 people we could potentially mislynch. One of those people then decided to go on a complete emo village bender in the thread, so despite not doing anything action wise that was villagery throughout the entire game, he removed himself from being a mislynch.

It annoyed me, but thems the breaks.
aww, I wasn't a potential mislynch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeLady
I mean, lemme tell you that there was absolutely NO way he was faking it. Literally none. It would impossible.

And yeah, it wasn't bad, I don't think it was against any rules, but it still tipped the game against us which sucked
luckily for you I'm ******ed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrighty Roo
That is solid wolfing brah.

I really want to be on a GOAT wolf team one day

Wish list:
Luckay
Hoya
Binkles

RNG gods make it happen
I don't know how I made it onto this list, but I'm not going to say no

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimHalpert
i agree with villa being included. Villas on pog have been self destructive for at least 6 months
+infinity

banning Villa would be the best move, because me and villa just don't do we'll when we're v/v

Quote:
Originally Posted by tweedybirdd
Hoya dropping truth bombs

POG, you need thicker skin. Combativeness is part of the game.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Tehtoes
my name has been mentioned AND I DON'T LIKE IT
04-02-2012 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Moocher
Aksdal, you F3ing br0?
wut
04-03-2012 , 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
Moving the goalposts all over the place itt. The point is not that I should be able to call whomever I want a ****ing **********. The point is I SHOULD be able to needle them via argument, call them a liar, accuse them of faking emotions, prove that they are misremembering their previous games, and demonstrate that someone is being inconsistent, even if it takes 50 posts to get other lazy players to read it and understand what I'm saying, without being told I should "stop lawyering" or "stop going on and on" or "talk about something else."

I do not give a **** if my play annoys people, and NO ONE should. This is what I mean when I say I think people are now prioritizing being "nice" - and it's a weird passive-aggressive version of "nice" that remains cliquish, arrogant and unfair - over playing well.

It's almost as if we now believe it is bad to be mean in game threads, but better to be mean in post-game threads, which is precisely backwards. The situation should be that (nearly) anything goes during a game, and that people's real personalities are revealed after the games end. Being an ******* in post-game is a lot worse than in-game, but some of the "nicest" people are the most passive-aggressively critical in post-game.

Or, in other words, WW is no longer about persuasiveness, but about faux friendship.
I don't think many people, if any, would call the things you mentioned a problem

I don't think there's a movement to take arguing out of ww

I have no idea where this is coming from
04-03-2012 , 12:02 AM
I think we need more discussion of this topic.
04-03-2012 , 12:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by globetrotter
I think we need more discussion of this topic.
In
04-03-2012 , 12:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsball8806
I think I agree with cphoya but only because I'm not really a nice person in ww at all.
I agree with his position but I have no idea who his opponent is

who thinks arguing about whether someone is lying or not should not be in ww?
04-03-2012 , 12:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
The bar for "being a dick" has been lowered to the point that it's synonymous with arguing at all.
show some evidence, mr lawyer
04-03-2012 , 12:33 AM
Cliffs: people in POG need to grow some thicker skin. ffs, it's a mother****ing game

      
m