Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Pog Pub IV (NSFW) -- Everyone Welcome even gurlz Pog Pub IV (NSFW) -- Everyone Welcome even gurlz

10-13-2010 , 12:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckleslovakian
It's not that Muse is bad. In fact I like Muse. They just aren't quite as inspired as other bands.
There are some scathing reviews that call them a Radiohead clone that tries too hard to be overly bombastic. I can see it but I don't necessarily agree
10-13-2010 , 12:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckleslovakian
It's not that Muse is bad. In fact I like Muse. They just aren't quite as inspired as other bands.
The one thing I like about them is they have taken ownership of their own sound.
10-13-2010 , 12:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
The one thing I like about them is they have taken ownership of their own sound.
lol @ "one" thing....but still
10-13-2010 , 12:47 AM
It wasn't exactly difficult to figure out no one was going to my hometown in middle of nowhere Ohio.
10-13-2010 , 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Like...name a bad song on absolution. You can't. But go ahead and try.
this is easy

blackout.
10-13-2010 , 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwami42
There are some scathing reviews that call them a Radiohead clone that tries too hard to be overly bombastic. I can see it but I don't necessarily agree
Anyone who compares Muse to Radiohead has not listened to either one, or neither of the bands. Their lead singers are similar. Thats it.
10-13-2010 , 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyd
youre right about some of those songs but am i wrong in saying that when the beatles did those songs they were kind of tribute/homage to those respective genres whereas the stones feels a bit more ingrained? idk. maybe its just bc the beatles were so good at so many different kinds of music.
I think some of it is that it sounds that way now. The argument then was that the Beatles want to hold your hand, the Stones wanted to rape your daughter. And who knows what The Who wanted to do (I'm assuming Pink Floyd wanted to get you to pay for their art school).

At the time, the Stones were more "real"- it's important that "Revolution" (whose lyrics are actually very anti-revolutionary) came out the same week as "Street Fighting Man" (whose lyrics are indecipherable but presumably *very* revolutionary)- but listening to them today, I think it's a wash. Like the Beatles understood these songs were going to last for more than just a few months.
10-13-2010 , 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyd
this is easy

blackout.
touche
10-13-2010 , 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
If someone suggests ruled by secrecy, i'll have a discussion with you. Anything else is just wrong.
ruled by secrecy is the best "soft" song on absolution.
10-13-2010 , 12:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Anyone who compares Muse to Radiohead has no listened to either one, or neither of the bands. Their lead singers are similar. Thats it.
+10000

Jeebus.
10-13-2010 , 12:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnThInIcE911
It wasn't exactly difficult to figure out no one was going to my hometown in middle of nowhere Ohio.
when your from canada, its not exactly easy

afterall I just finished moving to middle of no where iowa for 2 weeks

Last edited by McAvoy; 10-13-2010 at 12:50 AM. Reason: but the funny part was I told half the people it was idaho in my drunkenness
10-13-2010 , 12:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyd
ruled by secrecy is the best "soft" song on absolution.
do you count falling away with you or sing for absolution?
10-13-2010 , 12:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Anyone who compares Muse to Radiohead has no listened to either one, or neither of the bands. Their lead singers are similar. Thats it.
the bends.

/end discussion


but seriously i agree.. it starts and ends with the lead singers.. especially now that muse has gone all prog and radiohead has gone electronic
10-13-2010 , 12:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
I gotta go to sleep, but my last contribution of the night:

Rolling Stones > Beatles
Oh no he didn't!

The Stones would never have made it without the Beatles.

Lennon even told Mick Jagger that they wouldn't go anywhere if they didn't start writing their own stuff.
10-13-2010 , 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
do you count falling away with you or sing for absolution?
i count falling away, blackout, and endlessly
10-13-2010 , 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyd
i count falling away, blackout, and endlessly
falling away is probably muses 3rd best song.
10-13-2010 , 12:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by legend42
I think some of it is that it sounds that way now. The argument then was that the Beatles want to hold your hand, the Stones wanted to rape your daughter. And who knows what The Who wanted to do (I'm assuming Pink Floyd wanted to get you to pay for their art school).

At the time, the Stones were more "real"- it's important that "Revolution" (whose lyrics are actually very anti-revolutionary) came out the same week as "Street Fighting Man" (whose lyrics are indecipherable but presumably *very* revolutionary)- but listening to them today, I think it's a wash. Like the Beatles understood these songs were going to last for more than just a few months.
yeah i mean being that i was born after all of this i guess i miss out on a lot of context and such.
10-13-2010 , 12:52 AM
74 jailbreak
10-13-2010 , 12:52 AM
The most underrated muse song: soldier's poem. Discuss.
10-13-2010 , 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
falling away is probably muses 3rd best song.
lol im so rusty on muse (its probably been 3 years since i was really into them) that to me theres like a 15ish song cluster of songs all at the top that i would have trouble ranking at the moment. falling away is way good tho
10-13-2010 , 12:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
The most underrated muse song: soldier's poem. Discuss.
i mean its so diff than most of their songs.. idk im not a big fan of it.
10-13-2010 , 12:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyd
i mean its so diff than most of their songs.. idk im not a big fan of it.
I used to skip it when i was going through black holes. Now its like....one of my fav songs on the album.
10-13-2010 , 12:54 AM
Whenever anyone brings up the 'xxxx > Beatles' argument, I just note that one week in 1966 (i think it was), the Beatles had the top 5 songs. Not a song in the top 5, all of the top 5 songs.

Yes, it was pop (the Beatles started off as pop, but they had amazing stuff in their last 4 years together), yes the public isn't necessarily the best barometer, but something has got to be said for a band that had the whole top 5 in one week. Most bands nowadays don't even release 5 songs from a whole album.

Last edited by Swiitch; 10-13-2010 at 12:56 AM. Reason: Just looked it up, it was in 1964
10-13-2010 , 12:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiitch
Whenever anyone brings up the 'xxxx > Beatles' argument, I just note that one week in 1966 (i think it was), the Beatles had the top 5 songs. Not a song in the top 5, all of the top 5 songs.

Yes, it was pop (the Beatles started off as pop, but they had amazing stuff in their last 4 years together), yes the public isn't necessarily the best barometer, but something has got to be said for a band that had the whole top 5 in one week. Most bands nowadays don't even release 5 songs from a whole album.
dark side of the moon was on the billboard 200 for 714 weeks. Then was off for one week. Then back on for another 500 + weeks.
10-13-2010 , 12:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
I used to skip it when i was going through black holes. Now its like....one of my fav songs on the album.
its very well placed for like maximum effect. im a music masochist who listens to primarily albums so i like never skip tracks.

      
m