Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
POG Politics Thread Version 3 POG Politics Thread Version 3

11-17-2022 , 06:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
I mean my initial guess is you just don't really understand Russian and Soviet history, Luckbox. As such you are just repeating the western anti-communist propaganda line you have heard about Russian royalty.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
I'm not up to speed too much on the French revolution or the Russia revolution.
yeah
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 06:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Zeus
Would you rather they kept them alive till they turn 18 then kill them?
Yes that would be better. At least give them a little chance at life.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 07:37 PM
Who came up with Georgia's quirky runoff system?
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 10:33 PM
Genuinely impressed with how quickly Musk demolished twitter
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 10:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
yeah
The key point is that I don't have to be versed on either revolution to know that killing kids is bad.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 10:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
The key point is that I don't have to be versed on either revolution to know that killing kids is bad.
You aren't really engaging with the discussion.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 10:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
You aren't really engaging with the discussion.
Your last point was literally "we celebrate the French for killing kids"-- which we don't.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Your last point was literally "we celebrate the French for killing kids"-- which we don't.
I don't really understand what you are doing here. This is just like before. You know this isn't something I said. And I know it isn't something I said. And I know that you know this isn't something I said.

Like what are you doing here? If you don't want to have this discussion we don't have to have it. No one has a gun to your head.

So is this your way of trying to terminate the discussion? By telling an obvious lie?

What is your goal here...are you just trying to bandy words?
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 11:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
not sure if "wrongly" is the correct paradigm to use

During the French revolution, peasants guillotined and murdered tons of royalty. Yet we celebrate it as a victory for liberty and progress. No one pearl clutches about how executing the royalty was "gratuitous" or whatever.

Asking whether those executions were "right" or "wrong" feels silly doesn't it?

Seems more just a matter of being realistic about how social revolutions happen. They are always violent, and necessarily so.

The only reason in the West that we continually try to drum up sympathy for the Romanovs is because of anti-communist sentiment.
This was the last post of any substance that you made here-- but what is your point? Is it that we think killing kids in French revolution was ok? Because we don't do that either.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 11:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
This was the last post of any substance that you made here-- but what is your point? Is it that we think killing kids in French revolution was ok? Because we don't do that either.
Where did I say we celebrate kids being murdered in the french revolution?
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 11:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Like I'm not sure if you were suggesting that my observations about the French Revolution was whataboutism, but if you were, I will say this:

The point is not to be like "look here are horrible things the French revolutionaries did during the French Revolution" as a means of distracting from what happened during the Russian Revolution.

My point is to observe historical examples of how social revolution occurs and draw a pragmatic understanding. Westerners correctly accept that violence was necessary to bring about social change in France. And said violence is very hard to control or organize. I don't think anyone is "happy" about tons and tons of people dying (on either side of the affair) but we understand it was in most instances unavoidable and a necessary part of the revolution.

We don't see countless examples of movies, shows, and stories romanticizing the French nobility at the time, and victimizing them and making their deaths or removal from power seem tragic. But we do for the Romanovs. And the reason is that it was communists, rather than liberals, who were behind the Russian revolution.
now do Trotsky
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-17-2022 , 11:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnsall
Who came up with Georgia's quirky runoff system?
imagine being Reverend Senator Warnock and having to go to a runoff against the biggest clown in the history of Georgia politics
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 12:49 AM
Posting a unilateral point of view and inference of other people's comments and calling it a discussion is quite liberal.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 12:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamnotawerewolf
imagine being Reverend Senator Warnock and having to go to a runoff against the biggest clown in the history of Georgia politics
Quite the bad beat. Feel like I may buy walker at current price given senate has been decided already.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 05:10 AM
My perspective is the communists made a whole bunch of bad decisions that killed a bunch of people. Some were malicious, some were done with long term benefits in mind (e.g. modernising Russia, protecting revolution etc.)

The killing of the Romanov's, three kids, is much much much better than the decisions made that led to the famine in Ukraine.

Both led to lots of death.

Killing the people who were seen to be the standard bearers + figure heads for the anti-Communist side, during a civil war, seems like a standard war decision that consistent with their ideology and morality is necessary to protect more childrens lives.

The decisions made that led to holodomor were much more evil via incompetence, malice, and lack of care.


IMO as a leader your decisions always lead to death and the distinction between actively killing someone (Romanov's) and letting people die (kinda Holodomor though this is a huge simplification) is non-existent. Your suggesting that kids lives "in the round" are more valuable and should be a no go. But I can't get behind that
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 11:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Where did I say we celebrate kids being murdered in the french revolution?
This was the implication. We're talking about killing kids in this discussion and you said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman
During the French revolution, peasants guillotined and murdered tons of royalty. Yet we celebrate it as a victory for liberty and progress. No one pearl clutches about how executing the royalty was "gratuitous" or whatever.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
This was the implication. We're talking about killing kids in this discussion and you said:
Ok so you agree you made it up?
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Zeus
The killing of the Romanov's, three kids, is much much much better than the decisions made that led to the famine in Ukraine.
Which decisions that led to the famine in Ukraine are you referring to here?
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Which decisions that led to the famine in Ukraine are you referring to here?
Explicitly denying aid to people who were struggling was very bad, and, in the face of horror continuing as they were.

Then ignoring the warning signs from their own people, treating people who raised the warning signs as traitors, and firing then later killing them wasn't good.

Even Vlas Chubar, who had a huge part in creating the problem, eventually tried to fight it and was killed for it.

Following the wrong form of agronomy was also bad, and, seems to have been done for ideological reasons in spite of evidence.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Zeus
Explicitly denying aid to people who were struggling was very bad, and, in the face of horror continuing as they were.

Then ignoring the warning signs from their own people, treating people who raised the warning signs as traitors, and firing then later killing them wasn't good.

Even Vlas Chubar, who had a huge part in creating the problem, eventually tried to fight it and was killed for it.

Following the wrong form of agronomy was also bad, and, seems to have been done for ideological reasons in spite of evidence.
Ok just a little confused because you referred to it as "Holodomor" in your previous post, which is a specific name given to the conjecture that the "famine" was a deliberate act by the Soviet government to starve millions of people and thus is an act of genocide.

But what you refer to in this post seems like you are mostly saying the famine was not deliberate, and instead was simply unnecessary suffering as a result of incompetence.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Zeus
Explicitly denying aid to people who were struggling was very bad, and, in the face of horror continuing as they were.
Also curious about this. What I’ve seen says the opposite—that the Soviet government provided quite a bit of famine relief.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 03:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Ok just a little confused because you referred to it as "Holodomor" in your previous post, which is a specific name given to the conjecture that the "famine" was a deliberate act by the Soviet government to starve millions of people and thus is an act of genocide.

But what you refer to in this post seems like you are mostly saying the famine was not deliberate, and instead was simply unnecessary suffering as a result of incompetence.
I consider alot of this a deliberate act esp the rejection of aid and ongoing collectivization
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 03:15 PM
i can think of a couple govts who did clearly, and openly, starve people on purpose

the govts of everyone posting on this page
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Zeus
I consider alot of this a deliberate act esp the rejection of aid and ongoing collectivization
Deliberate as in “we are going to cause a famine (that otherwise would not have occurred) in order to cause the deaths of millions”?
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote
11-18-2022 , 10:06 PM
in the old time, in the old time

in the old time, conscious indifference was not a crime


Last edited by iamnotawerewolf; 11-18-2022 at 10:12 PM.
POG Politics Thread Version 3 Quote

      
m