Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman10687
Why is this relevant unless your main objective is to play some sort of perverse, historical blame game?
it's relevant because the game, and I agree it is perverse, is Whose Land Is It Anyway
mets argued that political domination of the land changed hands multiple times, yet you maintain that you are only concerned with European domination, because only Europeans get to be imperialists
prior conquerors dislocated locals, installed their own locals, and those new locals were then dislocated by subsequent conquerors
most of those people were muslim, but they were not really a singular people - until teh joos starting moving in (well before 1948), at which point suddenly there was a national sanctity being jeopardized