Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than Well Named, who else are we about to "permanently" ban? Other than Well Named, who else are we about to "permanently" ban?

01-23-2015 , 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top Tier Tom
Mets you are dirt stop procreating
Mets is awesome and deserves happiness and kids, if he so pleases
01-23-2015 , 03:56 PM
*Mets you are dead stop posting
01-23-2015 , 04:54 PM
Isn't mets too old for kids? I wouldn't recommend kids when u are over 50 tbh. To each its own I guess.
01-23-2015 , 04:55 PM
Quarrrr take a break. See you in 3 months, get some help etc
01-23-2015 , 04:55 PM
sick burn
01-23-2015 , 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBrokenATM!
Quarrrr take a break. See you in 3 months, get some help etc
Im currently hospitalized so I think Im already getting all the help I need.
01-23-2015 , 06:13 PM
Captain Luffy needs some sort of warning/infraction for his recent games.

Game 1: 17er where on d3 it was 6 villas, 3 wolves (Luffy/TTT/monstr... TTT/monstr were outed tbf). Luffy decides to concede. Even though TTT/monstr were outed, it essentially would have gotten down to f5 with 1 wolf left (Luffy). That game is still completely winnable imo.

Game 2: 13er with 4 villas, 3 wolves (no lock votes, but MAJ is in affact). Luffy self votes as a villager to end the game.
01-23-2015 , 06:16 PM
ban everyone
01-23-2015 , 06:24 PM
Quote:
Game 2: 13er with 4 villas, 3 wolves (no lock votes, but MAJ is in affact). Luffy self votes as a villager to end the game.
bold strategy
01-23-2015 , 06:27 PM
Technically he didn't cap the maj himself, let's not overstate things.
01-23-2015 , 06:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirRawrsALot
Captain Luffy needs some sort of warning/infraction for his recent games.

Game 1: 17er where on d3 it was 6 villas, 3 wolves (Luffy/TTT/monstr... TTT/monstr were outed tbf). Luffy decides to concede. Even though TTT/monstr were outed, it essentially would have gotten down to f5 with 1 wolf left (Luffy). That game is still completely winnable imo.

Game 2: 13er with 4 villas, 3 wolves (no lock votes, but MAJ is in affact). Luffy self votes as a villager to end the game.
I don't think your description of Game 1 is completely accurate but I just read what happened in Game 2 and it's obv terrible and I'll talk it over with Hoya and WN.

Yes WN, that means you have to get on Skype you weasel.
01-23-2015 , 06:34 PM
Pretty sure my description is accurate, but I could be wrong (lolme, was wrong)

17er
Day 1 - 12/4/1 villager lynched AND villager MKed, giving the wolves 2 NKs
Day 2 - 8/4/1 - Seer claims with monstr wolf peek, TTT decides to counter claim because ????, village ends up voting outside the claims and lynches mexi (wolf)
Day 3 - 8/3 (Oh, so yeah 6/3 was wrong). TTT/monstr gets lynched
Day 4 - 7/2 - The other gets lynched
Day 5 - 6/1 - Eh, ok, so he needs three mislynches. Still tough but not impossible. If everybody conceded just because there are a huge dog, there would be a lot more concedes. Villages are completely capable of imploding.
01-23-2015 , 06:36 PM
rawrs i was in that game, i know what happened

in fact all 3 of the mods played in it
01-23-2015 , 06:43 PM
Dorks ^^
01-23-2015 , 06:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossnerd
Dorks ^^
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quarrrr
How come women are still allowed to post here? More than that, allowed to give their opinion. I mean this is a forum for intellectually developed human beings, not for women.

It F-s up the whole essence of this forum.

Ban em, thank you.
.
01-23-2015 , 06:48 PM
Your humor is also dorkish

Don't you know it's considered gauche these days to do that whole ironic lolwomen thing? Get with the times, bra
01-23-2015 , 06:53 PM
all i saw was bra
01-23-2015 , 06:54 PM
THEY ARE SO TINY!!
01-23-2015 , 06:55 PM
captain luffy was fine in the mish mash as far as i remember

the vanillas did him in i guess
01-23-2015 , 07:00 PM
Not that this is actually a thing that applies in this situation yet but self-voting ought to just be prima facie evidence of sabotage and a party-foul level ban, unless the player can come up with an actual strategic reason for doing it (e.g. saving a claimed seer as a villager, ending a day early as a peeked wolf in a vanilla, saving a more powerful wolf in a mash).

Someone's going to say "but I can GET REACTIONS" from it and that person should self-punch in the face.
01-23-2015 , 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWetzel
Not that this is actually a thing that applies in this situation yet but self-voting ought to just be prima facie evidence of sabotage and a party-foul level ban, unless the player can come up with an actual strategic reason for doing it (e.g. saving a claimed seer as a villager, ending a day early as a peeked wolf in a vanilla, saving a more powerful wolf in a mash).

Someone's going to say "but I can GET REACTIONS" from it and that person should self-punch in the face.
The defense is going to be that people should be allowed to have emo meltdowns FWIW.
01-23-2015 , 07:14 PM
werewolf is 97% trolling anyway

why take away our rights
01-23-2015 , 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LKJ
The defense is going to be that people should be allowed to have emo meltdowns FWIW.
I assumed they were doing that to get reactions, and classified it accordingly.
01-23-2015 , 08:11 PM
Let's just all collectively take a stance on self voting

Its only allowed when you're an outted wolf and trying to end the day early as to not lead to further discussion in thread.

Any other instance where its used and we (POG community) will ask that the mods take action against the offending party.

glgl
01-23-2015 , 08:25 PM
and while we're at it let's ban tom for hard claiming seer without being seer

unless outing himself was a strategic advantage??

      
m