Im against it

I'm also not going to take away the voting villager's 50% equity to win just bc his teammate missed the deadline.

whyyyyy

So, say that we are making the tiebreaker the failure of one player to vote.

However, that does give me pause, because it could give rise to a situation where villager Crossnerd votes villager VR and vice versa, and wolf atak fails to vote at all. Interestingly enough, that might give the village the win even though not a single villager voted correctly.

That would be pretty funny.

The teammate shouldn't be allowed to purposely miss the deadline is my point


I domt want to give the win to the wolves

But make the person vote

Be a hero or a goat

The point is they aren't purpposely missing the deadline. You're double penalizing both villagers and just giving the wolves the win. For one person missing a deadline.

It should flip, that is the penalty. The wolf is already winning by getting the flip.

That would indeed be hilarious, but I don't understand how you're saying any rule set could produce this result. v1 votes v2, v2 votes v1, one of them gets lynched, wolf eats the other one... what am I missing?

(Plus I'm not thrilled at being the lazy wolf )

You're just arguing that a tie isn't a tie. I can't argue against that yo. The sky is green, fine. Whatevs

KruZe purposely missed the deadline

He admits it

And others say that's his right

I disagree very strongly. Very, very strongly. Also, if we believe this: Then why is it being disallowed?

Examples:

If you have a noob wolf partner, you can feed him stuff to say throughout the day and tell him how to respond to stuff so that he gets cleared.

You can make seer hunt more effective by immediately taking note of all peeks left in the thread and c/p'ing them into wolf chat throughout the day, freeing up more time for actual discussion at night to dissect these. This is way more efficient than both wolves individually taking note of this in a notepad or whatever and then comparing notes at night.

You can organize x-posts.

You can time your votes - maybe even plan a snipe together to make sure that the game ends or that the right person is lynched.

You can more quickly get a seer claim together in a stressful situation with the help of a partner in real-time.

I was going to argue that we set as the tiebreaker, the failure of a player to vote.

So in a f3 where one player doesn't vote and the vote is tied, whichever team that player is on loses. Then I giggled because I immediately thought of the above scenario as potential fallout from that rule.

1-1-0

is a different kind of tie from

1-1.

That's what I'm saying.

Thingy, how long has it been since you turboed?

Are you aware that turbos now have days in the 15-18 minute range?

Have you ever tried to wolfchat and also post in a turbo?

lol at taking notes in a turbo, it's a TURBO, ain't nobody got time for that.

No, you're arguing that 1-1-0 has two differently valued 1s, which is not true under any known system used by mankind.

1-1-0 is still a flip. You're allowed to not like it! But it's still a flip. The only way it isn't a flip is if you argue one of those 1s has a higher value than the other 1.

You cannot change the weight of a vote to suit a persons role in a vanilla.

I am actually coming around to your viewpoint, damnit, as I think it through.

****, I hate when that happens.

Well, I turboed just a few hours ago on my Danish forum :P

But I assume you mean here on POG. Yeah, I haven't played with those short days, but I don't see how that nullifies any of my arguments.

Yeah, I have tried to wolf chat and also post in a turbo. It helped out a ton.

I'm not saying that you should be chatting all the time with your fellow wolf - but there are brief moments in a day where a quick message from a fellow wolf can mean a lot, as per my examples.

Come on VR, We can drink scotch princesses, I'm gonna make a drink and name it that, I'm purrrty sure..

No, I'm arguing that it should be treated differently. And I still think it's more fun the other way. But I'm not sure I care for the implications.

lol, I always take notes in turbos :P

maybe that's why I seem to post less than others. I just thought it was because I was slower at reading. I've always assumed that most people actually took notes. I guess I just do it because of my insanely bad memory then.

That would be a great name for a drink.

I do not officially yield! But I'm thinking it over.

And I just wanna reiterate how annoyed I would be at my teammate for not voting, but it's kind of a "I do not agree with what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it' type dealio. IN before I get totally roasted with f3 non voter teammates in the future

Well, there may be a middle ground somewhere that we haven't though of yet, let's give it time on both our ends. <3

All right, you're both invited over for Scotch Princesses then. (Scottish Princesses,maybe?)

Cheers.

You are aware that this is kind of the case in some sports, right?

But basically soah's argument supporting the xnerd view was pretty irrefutable.