Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Noah's Grievance Thread Noah's Grievance Thread

06-06-2013 , 01:39 AM
You know you're in POG when the bickering over a ban lasts longer than the ban itself.
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:40 AM
I like crossnerd a lot.

How is nutshot's behavior at all relevant? Seriously, how does that work?

Person gets trolled, breaks "rules," such as they are, in the opinion of a mod, gets minor temp-ban. Explain how the prospect of nutshot being less of a troll is relevant to LKJ's perception of her behavior?
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:40 AM
I hope you're a gimmick
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
I like crossnerd a lot.

How is nutshot's behavior at all relevant? Seriously, how does that work?

Person gets trolled, breaks "rules," such as they are, in the opinion of a mod, gets minor temp-ban. Explain how the prospect of nutshot being less of a troll is relevant to LKJ's perception of her behavior?
You must be joking.
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcaw
I hope you're a gimmick
1st level thinker
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:42 AM
I think LKJ's perception of nutshot being less of a troll is all that is relevant(to him not also getting banned).
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:45 AM
How does nutshot NOT getting banned have anything to do with whether CN's ban is fine or not?
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72off
1st level thinker
yea yea, I just wanted to know who it was.
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:46 AM
Honestly this is why POG is so ******ed sometimes, you can't go harder than CN went so she got like a functional 9-hour ban or something. I've got no problem with her going hard like that and I don't think the tempban is even a bad thing, it's kind of hilarious and lends some validity to her posts anyways.

Whether nutshot gets banned or not for making posts that weren't nearly as "bad" - you should probably read the exchange - doesn't have anything to do with the decision re: CN. It's so obvious how this happened, jesus.
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
How does nutshot NOT getting banned have anything to do with whether CN's ban is fine or not?
uh , if people believe their behavior was similarly intended?

Last edited by kcaw; 06-06-2013 at 01:49 AM. Reason: whether or not one was actually more couth or not
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:48 AM
The argument you guys are making is essentially that nutshot made CN make bannable posts. That's so obviously ridiculous.
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:48 AM
If it's intended to be a troll but breaks no rules while CN's posts obviously break like 9 isn't it pretty clear what the ruling is going to be?
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:49 AM
Can the rest of you hurry up and start understanding what happened already? I'm paying Hoyaids by the minute here (~ $7)
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
Honestly this is why POG is so ******ed sometimes, you can't go harder than CN went so she got like a functional 9-hour ban or something. I've got no problem with her going hard like that and I don't think the tempban is even a bad thing, it's kind of hilarious and lends some validity to her posts anyways.

Whether nutshot gets banned or not for making posts that weren't nearly as "bad" - you should probably read the exchange - doesn't have anything to do with the decision re: CN. It's so obvious how this happened, jesus.
If nutshot had also been banned, how would you feel?
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:52 AM
the lesson to be learned here is that direct confrontation earns a ban but subtle trolling does not. nutshot is obviously much better at the subtle trolling
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:52 AM
Like seriously good lord, this is how trolling works. Those two don't like each other, CN fires SHATS (about how he should've been aborted, etc. - again I don't even care, but duh), nutshat fires more subdued SHATS, she gets rustled, he gets rustled, he SEIZES an opportunity to highlight like seriously 9 posts that break rules, she getsd temp'd, it's lol, nutshat wins this round of the troll olympics

she'll be back tomorrow and she'll probably come up with some new witticism and she's clever, sh eknows she can wield this to get him temp'd or something later anyway, who cares
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
Like seriously good lord, this is how trolling works. Those two don't like each other, CN fires SHATS (about how he should've been aborted, etc. - again I don't even care, but duh), nutshat fires more subdued SHATS, she gets rustle, he gets rustled, he SEIZES an opportunity to highlight like seriously 9 posts that break rules, she getsd temp'd, it's lol, nutshat wins this round of the troll olympics

she'll be back tomorrow and she'll probably come up with some new witticism and she's clever, sh eknows she can wield this to get him temp'd or something later anyway, who cares
hahahah i said it first. and in fewer words
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:53 AM
so knowing the intent of both, you go by a sterile definition of who needed banned?

what are we trying to prevent with bannings?
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcaw
If nutshot had also been banned, how would you feel?
I'd kinda feel like he shouldn't have been but I wouldn't really care, it's the hand-wringing and POG OUTRAGE that is so absurd to me
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:55 AM
we're trying to prevent idiots like teddyyy from doing teddyyy things, temp bans aren't for that and barely even register as an event, I have no idea what we're "trying to prevent" with TEMP bannings and I don't care unless your idea is the "nice police," which I have made my thoughts about very clear: that's the WORST thing about POG
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 01:59 AM
Also the definition of "troll" around here is predictably stupid, you're not a "troll" because you troll one or two people, you're a troll if you exist to be a suck on the forum. This too is totally obvious and a totally lol feature of POG "politics," which is too high-minded a term for the bull**** that goes on around here.

Obviosuly you can "troll" someone, but that does not a troll make.

Nich - I like nich - is closer to a troll than either of those two, given that he has started about 234671247442176421741 games that will never finish.
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 02:00 AM
well, it seems like since you didn't get modded when you campaigned for it, you found some passive-aggressive means to "lolpog", and the SE "hardposting" and "lolpog" meme gave you a convenient avenue to vent your stifles frustration.

I believe you legitimately do not like pog now.

and mostly because of that.
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 02:01 AM
passive aggressive?

pretty sure I'm just aggressive bro

also I like WW, I've never really liked how POG works, which I guess you missed the memo and/or HATE DOCUMENTS about
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 02:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anarchist
the lesson to be learned here is that direct confrontation earns a ban but subtle trolling does not. nutshot is obviously much better at the subtle trolling
Subtle trolling?

Nutshot?

Come again.
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote
06-06-2013 , 02:02 AM
kcaw
Noah's Grievance Thread Quote

      
m