Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
MtG III Game Thread MtG III Game Thread

10-13-2015 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
i mean my rule of thumb tends to be that if someone is doing x different from the last few times they were a villager, it might be a sign they're not a villager
I do question the wisdom of this assumption.

To an extent.

I am making that three-word phrase do a lot of work there. But in specific cases, I can see why someone would want to do something differently. Take Monte. A player with ego. I played in a game where I wolfed and he read me village pretty strongly. Then I believe the same thing might have happened again (where I wolfed and he village read me, although can't remember if he was active participant or DVC). Whatever the case, the ego is strong in this one and likely he does not want to do it again for risk of appearing foolish.

Just a thought.

Same thing might apply if someone was mislynched for doing something two or three games in a row. Players have to adapt too.
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bopolis
here's my Ace hottake,

he just got finished wolfing for a week, so I think the fact that he is comfortable enough to **** around like he has makes him more likely a villa
I like this read and think it is villagery.
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Moocher
LOOK AT WHAT INSANITY JUST DID GAD
yeah

weatherguy did it twice tho

struggling to figure out a way that that's both mechanically feasible and advisable d1

i understand what you're saying about it just being a thing that happens and unknown variables and whatnot, but the possibility of people wolfing in the open b/c nobody notices or remembers stuff always chafes me in these big mashes
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:31 AM
that's a sexy thread entrance by insanity I must say
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:31 AM
Lac=LC. Stupid phone
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stork..
awful

why?

also terrible and bad.
it strongly reminds me of those posts I call out as tmi in dvc and kick living-me/yell at the living villagers for not noticing
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:31 AM
Mod note:

If you think I have missed a spell that was played in the game thread, send me a PM.
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by insanity31
moocher
popcorn
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weatherguy
i thought you disliked him at first and liked him now. I think i saw one of your posts and just misunderstood the context or something.
me saying "lol adam" would probably mean i think he is a villager, (since i wouldn't be laughing at a wolf just pushing them), though it was the first page so i didn't really have an opinon, but i guess you confusion is ~ok.

you should slow down on the conclusions though, it is wolfy that you want to solve LITERALLY everything as fast as possible and be wanting to make bloodpacts and thunderdomes and hard statements all over the place.

seems overeager.
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
yeah

weatherguy did it twice tho

struggling to figure out a way that that's both mechanically feasible and advisable d1

i understand what you're saying about it just being a thing that happens and unknown variables and whatnot, but the possibility of people wolfing in the open b/c nobody notices or remembers stuff always chafes me in these big mashes
i take notes, accobra is doing the same afaik
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:32 AM
^ take all that back Gad, Monte probably a wolf, lol
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telcontar
If it sounds like WG has too much information then he probably does. He did the same thing in a recent wolf game
yeah wolf wg tmis all over the place
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
yeah

weatherguy did it twice tho

struggling to figure out a way that that's both mechanically feasible and advisable d1

i understand what you're saying about it just being a thing that happens and unknown variables and whatnot, but the possibility of people wolfing in the open b/c nobody notices or remembers stuff always chafes me in these big mashes
Why would gaining mana be in any way alignment indicative on day 1? Honestly asking cause I don't see why you think its wolfy?
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc-ohio
So it's fine for you to have music/walrus lac posts, but I can't discuss mtg in the mtg game?

And your piggyback reads are strong
I've posted loads of content too is the thing. You've not done much apart from tunnel me after I pushed you and ask a question allegedly to inform the thread of a risk but where you made no mention of the risk in that or followup posts (because there were no followup posts).
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:32 AM
Lord is being way too polite. I suspect this is because he doesn't want to draw attention and make enemies. As a villager, he welcomes heat and in general is a very funny jerk. One of my favorite players.

Him being polite is wolfy.
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lissa2
wg talks about that whole thing with too much certainty.
i don't think you understood the point i was trying to make. i'll keep it brief since i know nl doesn't want to hear about it.

stork was called a lock wolf if viggo was a wolf.

i disliked this because i think stork is likely a villa and viggo could possibly be a wolf. The only certainty i had was trying to show why it was silly to live in that kind of 100% lock world by displaying the inverse. NL then confirmed that he didn't believe it was 100% and he was probably just being a bit hyperbolic (which i believe)

lissa don't try to push me this game lol.
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lissa2
it strongly reminds me of those posts I call out as tmi in dvc and kick living-me/yell at the living villagers for not noticing
i thought you were agreeing with him but this is actually much better.

not bad at all.
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
I do question the wisdom of this assumption.

To an extent.

I am making that three-word phrase do a lot of work there. But in specific cases, I can see why someone would want to do something differently. Take Monte. A player with ego. I played in a game where I wolfed and he read me village pretty strongly. Then I believe the same thing might have happened again (where I wolfed and he village read me, although can't remember if he was active participant or DVC). Whatever the case, the ego is strong in this one and likely he does not want to do it again for risk of appearing foolish.

Just a thought.

Same thing might apply if someone was mislynched for doing something two or three games in a row. Players have to adapt too.
You and QB are like pan-Atlantic wonder twins of AIDS

In both of those games your team got destroyed
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
^ take all that back Gad, Monte probably a wolf, lol
Monte is a howling wolf.
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloobird
Stork is a sex offender?
please,

i prefer "deviant"
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:34 AM
villagers
yg
weatherguy
adam
moocher
stork
no lynches
lissa2
bloobird
gadarene
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stork..
me saying "lol adam" would probably mean i think he is a villager, (since i wouldn't be laughing at a wolf just pushing them), though it was the first page so i didn't really have an opinon, but i guess you confusion is ~ok.

you should slow down on the conclusions though, it is wolfy that you want to solve LITERALLY everything as fast as possible and be wanting to make bloodpacts and thunderdomes and hard statements all over the place.

seems overeager.
i haven't been trying to solve everything at all or any kind of bloodpacts

that argument was just a long-winded way to defend you
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:34 AM
I got something super useful
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
I do question the wisdom of this assumption.

To an extent.

I am making that three-word phrase do a lot of work there. But in specific cases, I can see why someone would want to do something differently. Take Monte. A player with ego. I played in a game where I wolfed and he read me village pretty strongly. Then I believe the same thing might have happened again (where I wolfed and he village read me, although can't remember if he was active participant or DVC). Whatever the case, the ego is strong in this one and likely he does not want to do it again for risk of appearing foolish.

Just a thought.

Same thing might apply if someone was mislynched for doing something two or three games in a row. Players have to adapt too.
i think i've seen Monte (1) call Quick Ben too stupid and incapable of a wide range to be anything but a villager in one game; (2) discover that Quick Ben was actually a wolf that game; (3) call Quick Ben too stupid and incapable of a wide range to be anything but a villager in the next game; (4) discover that Quick Ben was actually a wolf that game; and (5) call Quick Ben too stupid and incapable of a wide range to be anything but a villager in the game after that

so i'm not sure i agree that Monte is likely to switch up the certainty of his reads for risk of appearing foolish
MtG III Game Thread Quote
10-13-2015 , 11:34 AM
Fraleyight
MtG III Game Thread Quote

      
m