ooh i like i like! good thinking

that took you quite awhile to respond .. has to get it all nice in wolf chat?

that is not my defense at all .. in fact, i haven't bothered to defend myself
and if i did i would say that i've been working hard to help the village, not simply posting more. I don't do fluff sir.

lol .. my tone and my reasoning of why i'm a villager has nothing to do with it!

yesterday the only thing you said about me was that you didn't agree with voting an UTR (which i said i was okay with) .. probably because you were one

so hmm your reasoning doesn't match up with what you actually said yesterday .. sounds like a wolf jumping on a villager wagon to me .. uh oh!

There is two ways to interpret this imo:
wolves could have thought that mac was his peek but they could also have thought that globe was saying that mac was right about his peek:
so, a lot of villa points for mac but also some for pawn

mrs jonnyd seems villagery to me, I dont see reasons to vote her right now
she fooled me in lotr but she still had some bad posts, I dont remember seeing any here

hmm .. this seems a reasonable assumption but I think the mod said that neither Richard (Globe) not Albert(Mac?) knew who their theif was .. only the person who peeked Albert would know the thief they're informing on. so i'm not sure that your idea still really applies?

anyway soah
not because he is alive but because he doesnt seem very interested in finding wolves

8 minutes for someone to notice and reply to a post suggests wolfchat to you? I'm not F5ing the thread furiously. Then you suggest that I've contradicted myself, which seems unlikely if I was in wolf chat like you suggested. I was not against lynching an UTR yesterday because I was one (did you actually read the post?) I didn't vote for you yesterday (or (fake?) peek you last night) because I didn't do a re-read on you until this morning.

I'm assuming that wolves killed globe because of a post that they interpreted as a correct villa peek (this has nothing to do with globe's actual role)
the post I quoted is the most peek-like and can be interpreted as a mac=villa peek or as a convoluted pawn=villa peek

lies.

I love this cat.

and this post confirms it

your voting for an obvious villager

I peeked you villa last night so I'm wiling to go pocket trips

pocket trips

I didn't suggest .. you did contradict yourself. Wolfchat doesn't equal 24h babysitting. They can't control your EVERY move.

Then why did you say you commented on posts of mine you didn't like yesterday? You're really not making much sense. You should take a few minutes and get your story straight!

wow, you got 12 peeks last night ? nice! include me in your next round tonight if you survive. i want to be cleared

esse rocks at ww lately, his villager list is A1 except for kukra

ohhh ok. I can def. get down with that. I think because he said mac's a seer and they didn't kill mac i'm inclined to think pawn = villa and mac = oh so slight wolf lean

i'm hesitant to say this about mac because he seems to be a lot more active (not out of control) than the only other game i played with him so i'm counting on other people to read him and for the most part i've heard villa (as far as i remember)

i guess we'll just wait it out and see if any stronger opinions form

How can you say I'm more active when I didn't post yesterday until EOD?

I was totally UTR for over a day and 2 people pointed it out late yesterday.

i tried to clarify by saying less out of control .. basically i meant that you seem to be functioning normally in this game and that leads me to believe that you're trying to help the village .. but again i also have no idea how you play other than otters = wolf so i'll have to rely on others' opinions of you

Maybe they just missed you

+1

unless mrs jonnyd has done a 180 from LOTR, she's a villager here

keanureaver or lonely_but_rich would be good wagons to go along with WER

i could get with either of those but i'm inclined to go with

lonely-but-rich

hmm my biggest wolf leans are voting each other

I did not say I commented on posts of yours yesterday, you've been going full steam ahead with a skewed interpretation of what I said. Obviously, I only commented on one of your posts while I was more actively engaged in dialogue with Pocket Trips. All I said was that I quoted posts from both of you yesterday that I didn't agree with, in response to your claim that I was just blindly following the votes on you. All I was trying to show was that my vote for you didn't come entirely out of the blue. I didn't see anything worth voting for you yesterday until I went back and reread you and didn't care for for what I saw. However, your response today has been more villagery, so thanks for taking the time to respond.

Care to elaborate?

*two of my

i think keanu and lonelybutrich are voting each other

keanu>lonely I think

is it really my response or the fact that more people woke up and were like wtf why are you voting mrs. jonnyd?