Quote:
Originally Posted by iversonian
the implicit assumption is that that is a wolf tell, not posting what you consider real content. if you knew that it was not, would you then change your vote?
I'm having trouble following your argument, but it sounds like you're basically conceding that you can see why someone would believe you are not posting content (you may or may not actually be posting content in your opinion, but apparently it's not important to you to point out any of said content in rebuttal) but challenging the notion that people who are not posting content are good votes?
errm.
wut?
Did you have any thoughts on what I said about your voting earlier - that, though you're talking a lot about wanting wagons (which strikes me as red-herringy btw - nobody has suggested that we shouldn't have wagons), you don't seem too concerned about who the wagons are, just so long as we have them - which also gets a
wut?