Quote:
Originally Posted by DocEspana
Now witg ratchet I don't think he has such a plan. He is just lynching those who lynch him. Sort of revenge a bit. I would say that's low level villager play. Rookie Villagers feel pressure and lash back out at those exact people. But he isn't a rookie villager. He is a very well spoken and logical player by most of his posts so far. So he is high level olaying. The fact that he selects the people who voted for him (not BECAUSE they voted for him, nominally) makes me think he wants us to see them as legit scum targets but also wants anyone who suspected him to suffer an early demise.
So yea. It reads Hugh level mafia play to me. He uses decent logic unrelated to the votes for him to isolate out people who did vote for him. Seems too convenient to be accidental. And he is no amatuer, so the "rookie villagers do this too" angle flies out the windkw.
See, that would be fair if my reasons were completely flimsy. But I'd given some degree of voice to my suspicion on both Slendy and MSU, before they had even voted for me. I also don't like "oh, he is a high-level player, so he must have some alternative agenda at play here", which is exactly what this comes across as.
I do want people to consider them as legit scum, because I believe they are. Not altogether, but I am confident at least one scum is in there. The "suffer an early demise" thing doesn't make a great deal of sense either, because for Mafia Ratchet to want to get rid of those 3, those 3 would have to be town. The earliest I could get them all killed off would be Day 4, and by then, I would be bound to have more suspicion on me through all my supposed scum targets flipping town. So the notion I'd want to shut down all voices raising suspicion on me as early as possible just doesn't stand up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by road
Im here guys! I know you have been waiting for me!
I have skimmed most of the posts and skipped some of the long ones ( I will try to read up on them).
I'd suggest reading Dorion'sposts at the very, very least, because he provides summaries of events often.
Quote:
Originally Posted by road
(well, i will be off for some periods, but i will promise, i will be online up to eod. If not, you can all lynch me without feeling guilty, because then i just screwed up two eods.)
I don't like the <bolded>. It's like you're giving permission for us to suspect you, in an effort to come across as genuine and sincere. Like it's all "sorry guys, I'll try and help out but if I don't, don't feel bad, honestly!". Nothing particularly strong, but it comes across as false to me.