Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread #2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread

10-17-2013 , 10:14 PM
Hahaha a number of the guys from WalterFootball are keeping up with this and being as we are a very tight-knit group for an online forum(I've met a number of them in person and we do a yearly live draft at Walter's)of NFL fans, they are shocked at the overall civility. We yell, cuss, and scream at each other and then laugh about it after as we have a drink. It's a blast. Their reactions are hilarious cause I'm pretty sure a number of y'all would be horrified by how we typically play.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:24 PM
Ragnarok:
You should see me, yamato and VE in action on TL.

Game related, i am shocked by the amount of people who are willing to do nothing on D1. I thought the "championship" game was above that "let's wait for night actions and follow roles XYZ dundun" bull****. The worst part is all of those people can't possibly be mafia. :/
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:31 PM
You guys sure are talky. XD

Back on the Org, we probably average 100 posts per week for a game of this size. Our biggest-ever game, with 117 players, garnered as many posts in three months as the previous Championship game here did in one - and deads could post in ours!

Defeating so many scum will be tough. If only private comms were permitted. :P

Random Gods say I must Vote: BLFG!
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:32 PM
Haha lemme give you an example of what someone asked and was 100% serious.

Quote:
Can you swear on that site and call people ****ing stupid loser **** face that act too polite and need a good shower rape from good ole Jerry Sandusky and his fine Janitor pals
Yup. Welcome to mafia on WF.com. I love it.

That's one thing that we have started to do too much. I actually plan on bringing back some of the stuff I've seen over here and taking it there. Really liked some of the ideas.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:36 PM
lenc, why do you find me scummy brah? Same question for the rest of your reads.

Also are you using a translator or is english your second language?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbmurph22
Fun to flesh out the contradictions. Town people do them sometimes because they're not as careful, but evil does them too because of their duality.

Regarding evil, I think scum, regardless of their being and skill, really, really hate getting attention (along with their teammates). They often go out of their way to avoid speaking about them, even without conscious thought. It's really hard to lie about someones alignment when you are already aware.
Not true. I love to be the center of attention as scum and like to lead wagons on town. I do this because of the way you think, if you think someone won't do something as scum/evil/wolf then a smart would do it.

Ex: People fake info on my forum. When people fake it it obviously angers me as theyre usually wrong, but theyre also 99% town. So when someone does it I get extremely bad, but I know that theyre most likely town as no scum would obviously want to look THAT bad. A smart scum player would take advantage of me by faking info and getting me to convince the rest of town not to kill him because he is obviously town. Of course I now I just suggest killing them off for playing anti-town and annoying me so that can't be used against me, but yeah, EXAMPLE. :side:

Just remember not to assume anything in this game. I'm assuming the majority of people here are good enough to appear town as scum, if they're as good as advertised being in a CHAMPIONS game and all.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:36 PM
Oh god what a horrible opening post from Montmorency..
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:37 PM
Valar Morghulis hey have you read the thread fully?
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
So, crabby opened up his game by doing a multi-quote of a bunch of posts but not really saying anything interesting or having any point to it.

When it's pointed out, he says he did it to avoid making 40 (n.b. that it would have been like 12 acutally) posts and looking scummy.

But then he hasn't posted anything else. I think this is a huge wolf tell. His explanation only can be true if he's actually combining things because he has a lot to say. But he has nothing to say.

Crabby_MyBB
I agree with this btw.


Making a multi-quote is only useful if it is full of content and provides context to your thoughts. He just made a multi-quote to say how much he's going to enjoy this game and how good and smart other players appear to be.

crabby_myybb

Wouldn't mind pressuring him to actually doing something or getting a claim.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:40 PM
catching up still which is apparent as I basically said this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by BLFG
I find this post very funny because this is my signature on Vendetta Strada:
"It's in my experience scum, regardless of who they are or how skilled they are, absolutely, positively hate attention on themselves and their teammates, and will general go out of their way to avoid actually speaking about them, even subconciously, because it's hella hard to lie about someones alignment when you already know it."

One of the best players there once said that. In a game where he was scum. This definitely doesn't apply to good scum players. I laughed so hard when i read this because it totally gave away his alignment.
in response to the same quote.



I like smileys btw. You guys lack a lot of them. We have like 300 of real people.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
You guys sure are talky. XD

Back on the Org, we probably average 100 posts per week for a game of this size. Our biggest-ever game, with 117 players, garnered as many posts in three months as the previous Championship game here did in one - and deads could post in ours!

Defeating so many scum will be tough. If only private comms were permitted. :P

Random Gods say I must Vote: BLFG!
I'm skeptical that this vote is actually random
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:42 PM
Yeah VM, statement re: attention was just a copy of Big Kitty's sig on his site. Don't agree and he doesn't either don't think.

Rag, your boys need to lay off the HGH.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbmurph22
Yeah VM, statement re: attention was just a copy of Big Kitty's sig on his site. Don't agree and he doesn't either don't think.

Rag, your boys need to lay off the HGH.
Knowing him, he prolly is a few scotches and 12 pack of beer in. Awesome, awesome guy though.

And in betting news, Seahawks need a TD to cover the over. Make me money!
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
I'm skeptical that this vote is actually random
It's #2, and BLFG is #2, so BLFG's number is up! XD
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:00 PM
Someone asked me who I thought was scum. I'll probably make a list later, like 4 or 5 hours later, after reviewing the thread as it is hard to remember these names at the moment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbmurph22
Yeah VM, statement re: attention was just a copy of Big Kitty's sig on his site. Don't agree and he doesn't either don't think.

Rag, your boys need to lay off the HGH.
Yeah, Ive done similar things as scum where I say something that I do as scum and then actually do it to see if anyone notices. My level of confidence/arrogance knows no bounds usually.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:05 PM
How many hours to deadline?

I've just woken up and I'm heading to work. If I have a pc it will be easier to type my thoughts out
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:05 PM
Here are my thoughts on the current activity level and atmosphere surrounding the players:

** Players that appear Engaged:

-Darthe. He enters by advocating lynching the scummiest player, and he engages a lot of players when he thinks something's up with their logic, like in Post 187.
-well named. Yeah, opening by claiming villager seemed weird to me, but he makes good points and advocates lynching the scummiest players each round. His logic seems solid and his long posts are always about inner thought process rather than fluff.
-dbmurph22. Funny and alert. Doesn't seem shaken when people glance in his direction. Has potential to be a town leader, I'd wager.
-yamato77. He was the hound dog of the early part of the day but then went away. I expect him to come back. I like his approach of treating the game like it's vanilla.
-TommyDanger. Comes in with a bang, and advocates for lynching D1. He says we can force the scummiest people to claim so they're locked into their claims, but we don't want mass claiming. I like his atmosphere so far, playful but perceptive.
-BLFG. He's on STS from the start because he thinks proposing a no-lynch is suspicious. He took the torch from yamato in questioning people for the latter half of the game so far.
-Valar Morghulis. He came in late but he's got some a genuine feeling to him, and he advocates lynching D1. He mentions he likes to have OT talks with people, but I see why. I think it's kinda interesting he votes for Tommy but ignores STS voting for him. He votes for crabby after WN and Vineetrika.

** Players that appear Pensive:

-Maki. He opens by asking if lynching is the only weapon we've got, and says if we've got Vigs then we shouldn't lynch anyone. Claims that experienced players don't try to prove they're town or scum unless prompted by someone else. Says that this "puts a few people on his suspicious list right out of the gate" but doesn't specify whom until yamato promots. He says WN, VE, Darthe. Says people claiming villager are more likely to be scum than not, but explains how different gaming cultures could cloud his judgment. Non-commital responses, IMO. He waffles between appearing engaged and appearing aloof, which is a bad sign to me. I'm still put off by how Darthe said in Post 221 that Maki was "really scumhunting." In Post 254 he literally says he likes to join wagons at the end of the day. I dislike Post 386 because it shows he's watching the thread but doesn't seem to care what happens.
-STS_za. He opened the game by loosely advocating no lynching, and then saying he'll mainly lurk and listen, because lynching could lead to a mistake. But people keep getting on his case so he replies to them. He's apologetic and timid for the most part, as if he's trying not to cause a splash. I said he was probably town during his fight with BLFG but now I'm not sure after a second read. Saying it's "too soon to have suspects" in Post 201 stands out to me, and he says again in Post 212 that reactions are unreliable until late game. I kind of agree with that, but not with the way he says it. In Post 238 he was suddenly explosive about how BLFG was misrepresenting him, but I didn't see it, and told him to go clear his head. He later votes for Valar, which seems random to me seeing as how Valar had JUST appeared and STS was earlier saying "it's too soon to have suspects."
-Vineetrika. Opens with "I'm a slow reader" and comes back with a vote for Crabby and some explanation. I put him in pensive because he said his opinion may not be accurate. Do opinions need to be accurate? I'd like to see more from him today.
-Kojiru. I forgot this guy was even in the game until I did this re-read, which is a bad sign. He opens by saying he's excited about activity, but then isn't active himself. In Post 199 he says he wants to see everyone post before he posts, that's a bad sign too, there's plenty to discuss by that time.
-Shin Zangetsu. This has been discussed a bunch, but he seemed like he worked himself into a corner right off the bat. Called dbmurph a fence sitter and voted for him; I disagree.

** Players that are somewhere in the middle:

-Chips Ahoy. One of the regulars here, but I have no idea what he's doing. He opens with a vote for Vagos, another of the regulars. Then votes for BLFG based on his bio? When Vagos, myself, and BLFG ask for explanation, he ignores us, but he instead puts suspicion on well named, and then laughs off BLFG's prompt. That's a good amount of finger pointing with little substance.
-Ragnarock. Dude doesn't say anything substantial for the first 3 pages or so. I will say this is consistent with his claimed "I like to watch in D1" persona, as I played a turbo game with him and he got lynched in D1 for not voting.
-VisceraEyes. He opened with a villager claim and said well named was a suspect of his right off the bat because he wasn't sure if he was advocating a random lynch or not. He took it back promptly though, due to a misunderstanding.
-chrisrjdk. Not sure if he's just busy or bored, but he's one of the regulars here yet hasn't contributed much. I think he advocates lynching.
-Vagos. Opens with a video, a town read on VE and WE. Admits he's lurking for now, says VE yamato, WN and Valar are good guys. Doesn't like Maki or BLFG.
-Crabby_MyBB. Opens with that now-famed multiquote, but doesn't say a lot. I agree with him that Maki is saying timid things though.
-cjkalt. Comes in late, but makes a good (IMO) point that random lynch defeats the purpose of scumhunting. Says chrisrjdk is probably town.
-lenC. He's a regular here, and it seems like the regulars are too cool to jump into the game with the rest of us plebes or something. Votes for WN, then BLFG immediately interrogates him. I can't tell if he's avoiding the questions or just being half-invested like the other regulars.

** Players that are missing or too early to say:

-GMaster479. Missing.
-CPHoya. Missing.
-Bell. Just got here. Pithy entrance.
-Montorency. Just arrived right as I finished writing this. Randomly voted for BLFG? Needs follow-up.

I am more inclined to trust people who advocate lynching the scummiest player each day rather than advocating a no lynch and waiting for more information. Lynching *is* information. For this reason and others stated above, Maki was my top suspect until the moment I realized STS looks really bad with his "it's too early to have suspects" coupled with immediately voting for Valar when he appears, as pointed out by BLFG in Post 299.

STS_za requires further discussion, as does Maki, but the former gets my vote tonight. At least we've got some leads, not bad for just 12 hours or so.

Okay, that took entirely too long, and I'm going to get ready for bed. Work in the AM.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChampionsMod
#2 Player: BLFG



Username for this game: BLFG

Representing: Vendetta Strada

Started playing in: 2011

Qualifications:
BLFG was voted in to act as the sole representative for Vendetta Strada.

One of BLFG’s strongest strengths and plusses on his resume is the fact that he practically never gets lynched. He has only been lynched twice as town (once he lynched himself for a reason, and another time the mafia quickhammered him at lylo). In addition, on his home site of Vendetta Strada he has never been lynched as mafia.

BLFG has played ~30 games on Vendetta Strada and ~25 games on Team Liquid.

Bio:
"You either love him or you hate him (sometimes during the same phase)! Very aggressive, very active and very vocal about his suspicions. Dangerous for you if you do not share the same affiliation. Sometimes has serious problems communicating with other players. Whatever happens in the thread, BLFG will have a part in it!"


I just noticed this. I've only ever been lynched one without any info against me and I've played 60+ games and replaced back into said games as well so I probably have had around 100 lives.


jelly?
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:18 PM
Montmorency
Welcome to the game
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:21 PM
Quote:
-Montorency. Just arrived right as I finished writing this. Randomly voted for BLFG? Needs follow-up.
I am going to have a big problem if people play like they do in his forum. I read one game Montorency took part in. Everyone randomly voted for someone on D1 and the lynch flipped town detective... That was the D1... I don't even know how that can be called a game of mafia..
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:25 PM
dont be mean BLFG, ive heard that it isnt very nice to be mean.


Once again, scum arent the only ones that sometimes appear scummy. Bad town and aloof players can very much do the same and I don't really find montorency's start really scum. If BLFG is right, apparently it's just how they play on his forum(which I agree is a pretty bad style if that's how they go about every day phase).

Not saying he is town or even looks town for that matter, just wouldn't call what he did scummy.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:28 PM
I am all for lynching D1. Like others have already said lynching is the main tool that Villagers have to identify mafia and to get rid of them. And to do this, I judge people based on the claims they make. I haven't seen any claims made so far (other than I am a villager). Reading people based on their opinion on others is not my expertise. Well Named's reasoning are in-line with my thoughts and hence I went along by voting for the same person. If you need my opinion on individual player that has spoken so far, then it is not happening on D1.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:31 PM
Most of them, where I come from, do a random vote on D1 too, though I don't quiet agree with that approach.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:32 PM
The twoplustwo mobile app is pretty sweet. Even comes with a mafia and werewolf detector!
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:34 PM
I am off to bed now. I will see you all tomorrow.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote
10-17-2013 , 11:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
dont be mean BLFG, ive heard that it isnt very nice to be mean.


Once again, scum arent the only ones that sometimes appear scummy. Bad town and aloof players can very much do the same and I don't really find montorency's start really scum. If BLFG is right, apparently it's just how they play on his forum(which I agree is a pretty bad style if that's how they go about every day phase).

Not saying he is town or even looks town for that matter, just wouldn't call what he did scummy.
I am not calling him scum for it nor am i being mean.
I am just stating my opinion on how his posts should probably be looked at.

On the other hand, are we allowing these kinda people to coast on by doing nothing? I find it hilarious that i am often found to be scummy (not particularly on this game -- but in general) at the start of the game for trying to get things done and then there can be ~10 people in the game who "do not need to say anything but to place a random vote because that's what they always do" and it says nothing about their alignment.

I say we policy lynch those people in case we do not find a decent target for scumlynch on D1. At best there is scum hiding behind this "i don't need to do anything because because", at worst we lynch a useless townie.
#2 Game of Mafia Champions (WW Invitational) - Game Thread Quote

      
m