Quote:
Originally Posted by Nana7
I did not dismiss the logic, I said I did not follow it and asked for it to be made clear a couple of times. The parsed list looks artificial too me, which would make it an attempt at misdirection.
And I did not bother to look up the posts, they made it clear. Tony vouched for MNO, MNO vouched for Tony, that = masons. You say well maybe they are lovers? So what? It is still a claim and any town with a clue says, hey, don't lynch them today. Not "make them get more specific" and not "lynch them anyways"
Then read the long post and ask questions about it. You were in the thread at the time posting when Murska and I made those deductions. You didn't think they were important? Why didn't you say anything then? Only now you say "I didn't follow the logic" instead when it was the heart of the conversation. Your actions don't make sense from a town perspective.
To quickly summarize, since Giga flipped town and assuming MNO/Tony are town, the lynch was divided between two townies. Mafia would have sought to divide themselves between the two lynches. After the "claim" mafia would have put some votes on Giga to ensure that one of their own didn't get lynched that day. The rest of the mafia would spread themselves out (all the solo-voters). Now check the order of events (who voted for whom when), look at who voted without giving a reason, and you have the list. Then it's a matter of picking out the mafia from the inactives and spammers. Like I said Infidel wasn't on the list because Murska and I both agreed he read town.
Verbal
Also aren't you bothered by the fact that MNO/Tony have both been relatively inactive (both day 1 and day 2), they haven't contributed anything, and outside of the claim they both read mafia? Combine that with the fact that one breadcrumbed the other, and neither confirmed a role, one spent yesterday arguing with you over nothing right after Murska and I made good deductions, you aren't the least bit curious to what's going on?