I'm really worried by this apathetic attitude. Foolish doesn't make consistently long posts and argues his points like this as mafia.
It shouldn't be up to Foolish persuading you to vote x or y, you should be telling the rest of the thread what you think of Verbal, or Infidel.
? what. My vote has been on Foolishness since this day started and I only briefly put it on Athrexx to pressure him. I put it back onto Foolishness only after Athrexx started posting again. I'm not waiting for Foolishness to convince me of anything - I'm saying we'll know for sure either way once one of them gets lynched. The fact that a lot of people I'm suspicious of are pushing for Verbal and trying to get votes off of Foolishness is making me even more confident of my vote.
Let me ask you this, if we lynch Verbal and he flips town, does your position on Foolishness change at all? The way I see it, you pushed for Verbal first, with Foolishness in the vote lead. I could see Foolishness making a move to save himself and at the same time getting the most aggro player in this round on his side to start another bus. I don't know how he plays in forum mafia, but your perception of him doesn't line up with my experience with Foolishness in live mafia. He can easily be mafia as well. The fact that you cant see that makes me somewhat suspicious of you, although you're taking defending him to the extreme so maybe you're just blinded and/or trying to get verbal lynched any way you can.
I've read the analysis on Verbal and I'm not convinced enough to switch off of Foolishness. Maybe you can convince me by providing analysis of Foolishness on something I missed or didnt take into account.
Mango, what do you think of infidel or devourer instead of foolishness
they are both inactives and are people I would have wanted to pressure if we were all more active as a whole this day, but as it is, its like 1.5 hours till end of day and its somehow come down to foolishness and verbal. I'd lynch either of them over verbal actually, but not over foolishness.
Mango could be mafia for characterising my push on Verbal as a lurker lynch similar to Athexx, despite the fact that Verbal had 3x the posts and despite the fact my case had nothing to do with lurkiness.
I did not dismiss the logic, I said I did not follow it and asked for it to be made clear a couple of times. The parsed list looks artificial too me, which would make it an attempt at misdirection.
And I did not bother to look up the posts, they made it clear. Tony vouched for MNO, MNO vouched for Tony, that = masons. You say well maybe they are lovers? So what? It is still a claim and any town with a clue says, hey, don't lynch them today. Not "make them get more specific" and not "lynch them anyways"
Then read the long post and ask questions about it. You were in the thread at the time posting when Murska and I made those deductions. You didn't think they were important? Why didn't you say anything then? Only now you say "I didn't follow the logic" instead when it was the heart of the conversation. Your actions don't make sense from a town perspective.
To quickly summarize, since Giga flipped town and assuming MNO/Tony are town, the lynch was divided between two townies. Mafia would have sought to divide themselves between the two lynches. After the "claim" mafia would have put some votes on Giga to ensure that one of their own didn't get lynched that day. The rest of the mafia would spread themselves out (all the solo-voters). Now check the order of events (who voted for whom when), look at who voted without giving a reason, and you have the list. Then it's a matter of picking out the mafia from the inactives and spammers. Like I said Infidel wasn't on the list because Murska and I both agreed he read town.
Also aren't you bothered by the fact that MNO/Tony have both been relatively inactive (both day 1 and day 2), they haven't contributed anything, and outside of the claim they both read mafia? Combine that with the fact that one breadcrumbed the other, and neither confirmed a role, one spent yesterday arguing with you over nothing right after Murska and I made good deductions, you aren't the least bit curious to what's going on?