Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Table Ratings...Beta Table Ratings...Beta

02-13-2009 , 03:58 PM
I just noticed the Table Rating on Poker Table Ratings. Maybe I missed it before, but it appears that they're beta-ing a rating for each player. I think the algorithm needs some work however. I'm a very poor player and somehow have a 62 rating. Gus Hansen is a 3. OMGClayAiken a 45 and Durrrr is an 89.

Feel free to post yours, as well as your opinion as to its accuracy.
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:02 PM
That's because you play NL2 and Gus Hansen plays NL2Million

Last edited by MaxRaises; 02-13-2009 at 04:07 PM. Reason: I'm a 63 though, ship it.
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:03 PM
No data found


kill me pls ....
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:04 PM
imma 2...who can beat that
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:24 PM
Come again, plz?
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:26 PM
http://www.pokertableratings.com/overview/carrotsnake

seems a bit off, this guy killed the Ap games for a while and hes only got a 46
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:30 PM
taking a large upswing and then a downswing really hurts your rating
marginal winners with continuous up have much higher ratings than big winners with swings

also there ought to be a base increase in rating based on your ability to beat higher stakes
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:31 PM
http://www.pokertableratings.com/overview/chipsmcgee5

this is really all that needs to be said
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:34 PM
guess i'm wrong, this guy still has a high rating despite constant swings
http://www.pokertableratings.com/overview/daevils
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:35 PM
I'm a 28.

I have no idea what it means.
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by runout_mick
I'm a 28.

I have no idea what it means.
Doesn't seem to make much sense...I think it's on a scale of 1-100. Based on your results your number seems way off. I don't know if they factor VPIP, PFR, AF, etc. into the calculations as they supposedly do when they rate tables, but I do think the formula needs some tweaking.
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 04:57 PM
Yay pointless numbers for people to obsess over!
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 05:04 PM
oh snap im a 71!
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 05:07 PM
66
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 05:12 PM
Well TR has me at -12.52 BB/100 with a rating of 1, so I wouldn't get too carried away with it.
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 05:15 PM
What the **** is it in relation to?
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 05:21 PM
Yay, another tool by a datamining site that irate idiots can use to scare fish away!
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 05:24 PM
66ftw
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 05:28 PM
76 here i come gus
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 06:40 PM
82
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 06:59 PM
Solid 24!
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 07:56 PM
62 i am teh nub
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 08:32 PM
I'm a 0. Not even a 1, a damn zero.

I suck at cards
Table Ratings...Beta Quote
02-13-2009 , 09:25 PM
i think it has to do more with how youve done lately
Table Ratings...Beta Quote

      
m