Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Poker vs chess Poker vs chess

02-24-2011 , 08:50 AM
Chess sucks.
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 10:14 AM
Poker wins every time. Better shops and thread savers......
Spoiler:
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 10:28 AM
If you need to ask, you must be a terrible chess player.
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 10:49 AM
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 10:49 AM
diggler saving thread
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 12:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O dear
If you need to ask, you must be a terrible chess player.
this
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yuri
It's just laughable that somebody thinks that he can teach somebody to beat 10nl within 10 hours (including beating the rake).
How much strategy teaching do you need to give to one of those chinese nitregs on pokerstars?
How hard is it to teach someone how to call single raises with any pocket pair, reraise with QQ/KK/AA/AK, get it in with AA/KK, play for stacks on the flop if you hit a set with your pocket pair...?
It's not like you need much more to beat NL10...

Quote:
Originally Posted by saugakarel
I think both of these games have some staps where to get. Like you said firstly i can teach the basicks of the poker( ABC game), and in chess i can show him the basic moves and the main strategy how to play your game ( not just move your buttons) .
well, obviously, someone who just know the basics ( hand ranks/chess pieces movements, stuff like that ) will be much better at poker. At least he will win $ sometime ( even tho he'll obviously lose over the long run, unless he improves ). Which is why those 90/75 fish often have 3-4 buyins on the tables. Because being absolutely horrible in poker can still get you decent short term profits.

In chess, if you're horrible, you won't win anything. Not a game, not a good capture, not a good defense, not a good attack, nothing. You'll lose 100% of the time against a decent player.

But that's more about variance/luck than actual skill level.
So let's see it this way :
( I play both chess and poker btw ), if I were to try & teach someone to be a challenge for me in both game, it would be MUCH faster in poker.

Or from a slightly different point of view : If I were to teach someone how to be successful on the poker scene ( whether it'd be online or live ), again, it'd be much faster than teaching him how to be successful on the chess scene.
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 03:08 PM
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 03:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O dear
If you need to ask, you must be a terrible chess player.
If you think you can give a definitive answer to a ridiculously underdetermined question then you must be terrible at logic.
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 04:24 PM
In poker you can have short term wins even if you are a bad player, in chess you will lose every game against a much better player
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 04:43 PM
i havent literally LOL'ed in BBV in a long time. those jesus pics are awesome. you need to forward them to RGT
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 07:28 PM
The problem is that teaching someone to play chess is pointless: there's no money in chess! I've played thousands of games at some chess sites before I started playing poker, now I'm playing at microstakes and have won thousands of dollars.
Poker vs chess Quote
02-24-2011 , 09:36 PM
Poker vs chess Quote
02-25-2011 , 05:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pohlr96
FYP
Poker vs chess Quote
02-25-2011 , 05:54 AM
No monies heads up in chess, too much variance.
Poker vs chess Quote

      
m