Quote:
Originally Posted by yuri
It's just laughable that somebody thinks that he can teach somebody to beat 10nl within 10 hours (including beating the rake).
How much strategy teaching do you need to give to one of those chinese nitregs on pokerstars?
How hard is it to teach someone how to call single raises with any pocket pair, reraise with QQ/KK/AA/AK, get it in with AA/KK, play for stacks on the flop if you hit a set with your pocket pair...?
It's not like you need much more to beat NL10...
Quote:
Originally Posted by saugakarel
I think both of these games have some staps where to get. Like you said firstly i can teach the basicks of the poker( ABC game), and in chess i can show him the basic moves and the main strategy how to play your game ( not just move your buttons) .
well, obviously, someone who just know the basics ( hand ranks/chess pieces movements, stuff like that ) will be much better at poker. At least he will win $ sometime ( even tho he'll obviously lose over the long run, unless he improves ). Which is why those 90/75 fish often have 3-4 buyins on the tables. Because being absolutely horrible in poker can still get you decent short term profits.
In chess, if you're horrible, you won't win anything. Not a game, not a good capture, not a good defense, not a good attack, nothing. You'll lose 100% of the time against a decent player.
But that's more about variance/luck than actual skill level.
So let's see it this way :
( I play both chess and poker btw ), if I were to try & teach someone to be a challenge for me in both game, it would be MUCH faster in poker.
Or from a slightly different point of view : If I were to teach someone how to be successful on the poker scene ( whether it'd be online or live ), again, it'd be much faster than teaching him how to be successful on the chess scene.