Quote:
Originally Posted by zachvac
My plan all along was to play 250-300k hands. To win the bet at 300k hands I need to win at 2.5ptbb/100 or 5bb/100. That's over 3bb/100. At 3bb/100 that's $3/100 so 500k hands. I'll say right now if I play over 500k hands during this bet it is void. I will not play over 500k hands. It was not an angle and was not poor forsight. I quite simply have a 0% chance of winning the bet if I only win at 3bb/100. Playing 250-300k hands will be tough enough and currently I'm just over pace for 300k. 500k hands simply will not happen.
Also that's the reason I didn't post my gameplan when asked frequently for it before. I figure it's just lose/lose because either a. I lose action because of what I post or b. I get action because of what I post and then when I don't do it get accused of angling. My gameplan all along (since rush was introduced and I found out how soft it was) was to try to play ~8-10k hands/day of rush. But I've already played some non-rush and had an 18k hand day to start just sort of playing it by ear based on how I feel how soft the tables look and a bunch of other things.
Really not sure what you're talking about though and how that could possibly be even close to an angle.
I don't blame you for not posting your gameplan, I wouldn't either if I was in your position and there's nothing wrong with doing that.
I suppose the vagueness of winrates here totally through me off in your post, so I recant my accusation. But lets say you made a post that made it sound like you werent going to play a lot of hands, as in playing 200k hands or more isnt your gameplan. Something like
"If I can't win more than 4ptBB/100 im going to lose the bet"
That to me is a total angle to get more action, because playing 300k hands means that isnt the case.
What you did wasn't an angle though.