yes the pot is always a lock when u have the nut draws...tough beat

You owned yourself by misunderstanding a simple hand, put your glasses on and try looking at the action carefully. Clearly I wasn't taking about bluffing the small blind, I was taking about bluffing the player who limped in early, called a raise OOP then lead weak. Even if I had been talking about the sb I don't have psychic powers, before this hand he hadn't had the chance to make such a ******ed play as your reading of the play in this case.

Also I didn't think the pot was a lock just because I had a nut flush draw seefut, I also had a made straight on the turn vs two players who hadn't shown much interest (for them) in the pot. It seemed likely based on previous hands the limper would show up with a either weak ace or weak flush draw at best, and the sb was a flop calling station who could have had anything and would probably fold.

All of you clowns who don't think this is a beat based on my having 50% equity obviously lack the basic mathematical skills of addition and subtraction. True this is my equity, but how often should I actually win money in this hand? Take a look at the stack sizes again morans, it's really not rocket science.

And really if you think the flop was a fold given the EV I made on the turn in this case, that I expected to be playing more hands with these players (you don't think it pays not to let them think they can steal 'my' pots with weak bets?! lol) and that I can often bluff a good turn card... You're welcome at my tables any day.

I'm glad you were amused Banana, I hope you found it as funny as I found your video, and the notion that someone who never plays over PLO100 (who struggles with the dollar amounts at that level) thinks they can teach others to play.

I think I'll live somehow, the title of the thread ought to have clued you in on how dramatically this beat affected me assuming you had the reading comprehension skills of a seven year old.

I posted this thread for my own amusement and have got more than my money's worth out of the responses. Not one person has managed to work out the nature of the beat without it being spoonfed to them by the converter, even when I referred earlier to the stack sizes and with them also being in bold.

Thank god for omaha, I think I'm giving up NLHE altogether after this. It seems like such a waste of time considering how the enormous mental strain of having four hole cards completely confuses most players, just like the analysis of a simple hand plainly baffles all you miserable cretins. Go sit in the corner and don't bother me again till you learn how to spell poker.

dont cry.

nice flop call br0

lol at angry op

Can someone please explain to me how OP has "nut flush draw". Perhaps I'm missing something.

oh yeah....and....




[x]standard

ad6d (i believe) are on the board he has the kd5d obv.

and yes i just popped my cherry answering a ******ed question...

[] good post
[x] waste of life

troll or a plo50 player who thinks hes mastered the game?

so what turns were you going to bluff after calling the flop?

Lol @ OP making a totally ******ed thread and defending himself with equally ******ed logic.

I love threads like these they make me laugh

Your reasoning appears totally sound - because I posted one hand played at 'Stars at plo50, that must be the only site and level that I play, right?
/sarcasm

Now that we can all see both the other player's holdings, the precise card that rolls off on the turn seems particularly important. Actually that is not the main thing at all, what matters first is the action the UTG player takes based on what comes.

People criticising the flop call are the ones using utterly ******ed logic. Sometimes you need too much imagination and optimism to try to make a call seem profitable, in this case you just need to be able to read the hh correctly and see the 380bb pot that developed with me as a huge favourite.

If your analysis of the hand is limited to plugging cards into an equity calculator without understanding what the results mean, no wonder you can't manage to spot a beat here. I'm still waiting for some genius to work out how often I'll actually win money in the hand. I know the answer and I've dropped several unsubtle hints now, it ought to be obvious how to work it out, unfortunately I seem to be dealing with 99% empty-headed imbeciles who are just barely capable of bashing the keyboard to vacantly repeat catchphrases they've read on here again and again.

Please continue posting ****ing novels that no sane person will ever read as responses to comments showing what a ****ing idiot you are.

Love,

The 2+2 Community

A couple of paragraphs do not make a novel. If it's so hard for you to imagine the difference, here's a concrete example for you:

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2600/2600.txt

You don't represent the 2+2 Community you just represent lazy and ******ed.

SB had two diamonds and the 8d was a polluted out. SB knew exactly what you had. Read like a book.

Lol @ angry OP who keeps responding with very long bedtime stories to every post/ comment.