sweet, what do you put him on?

^^^^^^^^

I was just going to say might as well started folding kings pre!!!!

Since nobody here is going to give you a cookie, why don't you just tell us which streets you played horribly and we can move on. Either you played the Preflop through the River lead bet horribly, putting in 40% of effective stacks against the world's tightest player who could only be playing hands that beat you, or your laydown on the river was horrible. Let us know.

well played, all around

I already let you know in the original post . The preflop call was bad. The river bet was to get a call from aq/aj.

u cant limit someones range to two hands...AA and Ak!! QJs J10s KJ, KJs, sshould be in there, just a horible fold

yeah i don't know if you play small stakes full ring, but a 11/9 nit is never 3betting an utg raiser with qjs, kj, or kjs. and tjs has a royal flush.

then try to bust him with middle suited connectors not kq

inb4 Internet posts:

[ ] [ x ]
[x] [x]

Also, this is terrible, but if you think he has ak/aa why not just c/c the riv ?

u put ur self in a spot where u must call, if u are going to play the hand u have be willing to lose with it/ folding is always ganna be -ev

thought process?
wth is wrong with you..

totally agree.

This is why i still suck at poker. I snap call and just say to myself 'cooler'

You can't sum up a guy's game by quoting his preflop stats. They say very little about his postflop tendencies. Being super tight preflop doesn't mean he's not very very aggressive postflop and well capable of a bluff raise or thin raise on the river.

1% is a very very very very very small number. I'm not saying it's a high % but thinking he bluffs only 1% of the time gives him FAR too much credit.

This is awesome and very on-topic.

Did you call yet?

sick fold, its a tarp

This fold is the exact opposite of a hero call.

Is there such a thing as a hero fold? Don't think i've ever heard that term.

The problem with hero folds like this (especially when 40% of your stack is committed) is that they are long term losers.

Lets say you play 100 hands that are exactly like this, and each hand is $100.

IMO, you win in this scenario 95% of the time which results in $9,500.

You lose 5 times which results in -$500 for a total of $9,000.

So what are the odds of you correctly identifying the 5% losers?

There is a 95% chance that you will fold one of the 'winning' hands and a 5% chance you will fold one of the losing hands.

So odds are that you are going to fold one of the winning hands but still lose one of the losing hands. So by trying to make these hero folds, you merely decrease your overall value since the odds are you are still going to be losing that 5% (make sense).

This is why, in these types of scenarios, it is better to just make the call.

And this is why, I love shoving against nits and mice. They scare themselves into folding because 'obviously' I have the 1 or 2 hands that can beat them

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTH4KNiMyjU
Hero fold....... what a hero

What else did you hope for with KQ?

But then yet again the guy on WSOP folded similar hand

Hahahahaha.

This hand should not be in the preflop playbook when it comes to calling a three bet if you intend on investing $31 postflop but folding for another $60 on a board where you make Kings full.

There is nothing to suggest that you are beat here, it's not like you've cited previous history, or it's live play and there's some sick physical tell. If you're coolered, so be it, but you can't call the 3bet preflop, put $31 in postflop, and then fold on a board which is about as good as it's going to get for KQs for another $60.

If his range is so limited, why bother to lead the river? What's he calling with that you beat if you're convinced that he can only have an enormous preflop hand?

Sometimes people mix it up or step out of line preflop, his 3-bet % doesn't automatically mean he has to have AA etc.

read this op

I've seen a lot of misplayed hands in my day but this is just on a new level