and wtf man, we are having a discussion, why are you calling me dense?? Im open to all sides of the arguement are you?

1. this issue confuses you
2. you had never read the wiki entry to the subject we are discussing until right now
3. one of the only definitive statements you've made (100% of cases were in favor of the protesting non-payers) has quickly been proven completely wrong

based on these three statements alone, you should COMPLETELY stop talking about this topic until you actively educate yourself about it. i would pass the word along to your uncle as well.

you have not done an ounce of research about it. many of your underlying assumptions were wrong. don't turn this into an issue of OPEN MINDEDNESS. if someone starts an argument with me with completely erroneous facts and i dismiss that person, i am NOT being closed minded.

Yes this issue confuses me as it should confus everyone because its extremly compicated, anyways I dont really care so this discusion is pointless, if its legal ill pay my taxes and if it is not I will still pay my taxes because Ive got more important things than dealing with the government in any way

and BTW no your not really open-minded because you have called me names on multiple ocassions and your main proof is Wiki------ aka a very shaky source for info as anyone can edit it but im sure almost all it is true... Next time you have a discussion dont be a dick and call me names, I told you to provide me with info to prove your point and it took you like 10 posts to do so, the rest were calling me ********, im open to all sided of arguments at all times because I am very open minded and if someone has hard proof that they are right and I am wrong then that fine, ill live.

and the fact is there is 0 hard proof on this issue its pretty much hear-say (SP) thats why im not goign to get all bent out of shape about it like yourself.

SickGambler im with you buddy, f*** the government.

i only cited wiki cause its the first thing that pops up in google. you want me to find you links to each court case they cited specifically? are the links the wiki cite shaky too? are each of those individual links wrong, and therefore, not hard evidence?

i already provided you hard proof that one of your statements was completely wrong. whats your response to that?

holocaust never happened. are you open to this issue?
we never landed on the moon. are you open to this issue?
noah's ark. are you open to this issue?

its not about being close-minded, its about KNOWING the facts. and you admitted you don't. in fact, the only good thing you can say about yourself now is that you're an open minded ignoramus, something which you essentially already conceded in your previous posts.

[ignore list]

This should be a fact for everyone that likes there rights.......but the income tax things is just lfGAELIFeifu'epguje'pofjes;lkf'je'FOP'EK'flai'po all ****ed up

**** THE GOVERNMENT HYCHAYCKACHYACHACYAH:AOJC:SJKC

rofl sickgambler made this thread worthwhile

I love ranting about government no matter how incorherant it sounds (prolly very) Just ****ing hate them sooo much that I dont believe anything they do is legit... ehh F em

all offshore funds should be declared (if you want to be honest). the amount dosent matter.

and sorry but poker sites dont answer calls from the IRS about their customers. full tilt is already slow enough.

LOL @ people being honest on tax returns. Pulease.

T