Quote:
Originally Posted by noluck17
they lose less when they run bad, but they dont win more when they run good. i see the worst players in the world at commerce go on massive heaters and win 2000bbs in less than 100 hands on a regular basis. ive never once seen a good player do that.
okay fair enough
but I was talking about larger (but not too large) samples where I think the statement would hold true
take, for instance, your same terrible player from the commerce over 1000 hands - say he's still up a bit... he's "run good" over 1000 or so hands but another superior player who has "run goot" over 1000ish hands will probably have won more overall
maybe the crappy player is even below par @ the 1000 hand mark and despite "running good" overall, see what I mean?
"running good" = running well above reasonable expectation as I see it; well, if you're expectation is (realistically) god-awful, then you could be "running good" and just breaking even or just making a modest amount
Last edited by tiltymcfish0; 10-22-2008 at 02:43 AM.
Reason: uuhhhhhh so then you're still just losing more than the good player loses okay now it's semantics I give up