Quote:
The problem with slowplaying in this spot is that there are very few good second-best hand for your opponent to make. A turned draw might still fold (getting only 3.5:1), a turned lower pair isn't going to give you much action, and any PP that catches on the turn is more likely to beat you than pay you off. There just aren't enough scenarios where giving a free card allows to win a bit pot - certainly not enough to outweigh the value you could lose if someone is slowplaying a big K.
hmmm. maybe. but say a jack comes. i think a guy who holds a jack is probably putting in a bet on the turn. same for a guy with QT or AT or a turned flush draw. remember that these aren't disciplined, smart players. getting only 3.5:1 is probably not going to discourage all of them. they can fold when they have nothing, but it's a lot to ask of them to fold when they have something, just because i might have something better. also, someone might easily bluff on the turn if a low card comes. i'm not sure that checking is better, but i think it's closer than you think.
Quote:
Now, if the board where 448 double-suited and you have 88, then there are a lot more arguments for checking behind.
true...but i think people are also more likely to peel with overcards on this board, because no one believes that i have a 4 in the CO.