Quote:
Originally Posted by DougL
The 5th card in 5 card Omaha makes the nuts more likely to be out there and punishes fish more for playing more hands, say like 2nd and 3rd nut lows. I haven't really thought about what total % of hands are playable in 4 vs 5 card O/8, but I'm guessing you should play fewer and that having a super premium hand where all cards work together is more valuable. So the is only because the fish are still playing what are essentially 2 or 3 card hands. In O/8, that's slightly bad. In 5 card, it is just horrible and you're punishing them for being terrible. Like someone playing a bare A3 in O/8 in O/8 is making a mistake. In 5 card, it is lighting money on fire.
I've played a fair amount of L Big O 8 and thought about this. I think everything here is accurate except I'm not sure your VP$IP should be lower. Theoretically since the betting structure hasn't changed, it seems like the bar for "playable hand" should rise at about the same rate as hands get better with the 5th card. IOW a marginally playable four-card hand with a dangler is bad, but a marginally unplayable four-card hand with a coordinated fifth card becomes good.
So, in four-card I'm folding something like A
4
K
6
multiway. But I think A
4
K
6
5
might be marginally playable . You won't often get the magic 3-2 flop but the extra "focus" of the rundown with the five will let you flop some combo equity that gets you to the river to make your wheel-6 or backdoor flush whatever. Multiway O8 is very much a game of flopping just enough that you stay in to stumble your way into a much better hand by accident, IMO.
Implied odds probably tweak things marginally, but that's more a matter of which hands you play than how many you play.
Actually we should probably just start a Big O8 preflop thread in the O8 forum.
But I've never thought of LO8 as a great shorthand game. Split pot games shorthanded make everyone feel like they're losing to the rake, which leads to unsustainability unless it's a time game. An O8 expert probably is beating the rake if it's not too bad. I'm pretty sure you're often getting odds to call down with bad high bad low against even a moderately aggressive villain, so it seems like thin value raises would be a lot of your edge.
Eager to hear if my reasoning is suspect.....
Last edited by AKQJ10; 07-26-2018 at 05:14 PM.